Remote Monitoring of Patients With an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Under no or Maintenance Therapy
- Conditions
- Colitis, UlcerativeInflammatory Bowel DiseasesCrohn Disease
- Interventions
- Other: Remote monitoring
- Registration Number
- NCT06338930
- Lead Sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Brief Summary
Routine follow-up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) under stable doses of maintenance therapy or no IBD-related therapy at all, consists of intensive monitoring with prescheduled outpatient visits every six or twelve months. However, many of these patients do not require additional interventions from the IBD specialist during these visits. In addition, patients in long-term remission, often request a less frequent follow-up in the hospital and in consequence a less frequent absence from school or work. In conclusion, these routinely follow-up visits might put unnecessary burden on both healthcare providers and IBD patients, as well as on healthcare resources.
Until now, no clear standard was set for how to organize a remote monitoring programme that is feasible and safe in a large patient population. Despite the possible added value of remote monitoring for IBD patients on stable or no therapy and who are in remission, they are seldomly the targeted population in clinical trials analysing the effects of remote monitoring in IBD. Secondly, a significant reduction in outpatient clinic visits, is often not actively included in the programme, but more an outcome result. Finally, to compose a safe remote monitoring programme, subjective and objective parameters of disease activity should be collected.
With the ROADMAP study, the main objective is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of remote monitoring in IBD patients that are stable on their current therapy or receive no IBD-related therapy. Secondly, a health economic evaluation will be conducted. Patients will be randomised to either the remote monitoring group or control group. The remote monitoring group will visit the outpatient clinic after two years. During this two-year period, patients will be monitored remotely via three-monthly questionnaires (PRO-2, IBD disk, WPAI, EQ-5D-5L) and faecal calprotectin measures. An IBD nurse will evaluate all incoming data and act in case of red flags.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 456
Participants eligible for inclusion in this Trial must meet all of the following criteria:
-
Patients with Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis, or IBD type unclassified
-
Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
-
At least 18 years of age at the time of signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF)
-
Patients with access to Mynexuzhealth via smartphone or internet
-
Patients must fluently speak, write, read Dutch.
-
Patients under stable treatment with oral mesalamine, thiopurines, methotrexate, subcutaneous biologicals and/or oral small molecules or under no such therapies at all for at least two years
-
Patients having access to mynexuzhealth (plexus hospitals) or HiX (ZOL)
-
Patients willing to perform a home-based fecal calprotectin measurement every three months through CalproSmart or a similar application, or to go to their general practitioner or a hospital close by to perform a classical ELISA to measure fecal calprotectin every three months*
-
Patients willing to go to their general practitioner or a hospital close by to perform a blood test every year*
-
Patients willing to go to their general practitioner or a hospital close by to perform the required three-monthly blood tests in case of treatment with thiopurines or methotrexate (evaluation of liver tests and complete blood count)*
- On the day of the classical outpatient clinic organized every two years, this can be performed at UZ Leuven All participants that are considered for Trial participation, per the above criteria will be documented via applicable log forms in Investigator Site File (including Screen Failures).
Participants eligible for this Trial must not meet any of the following criteria:
- Patients receiving an intravenous biological therapy or any form of corticosteroids (with the exception of inhaled or dermatological corticosteroids) in the last two years,
- Patients with a change in concomitant IBD therapies in the last two years (except for rectal therapies),
- Patients with IBD-related surgery in the past two years,
- Patients in whom the IBD team estimates that a more frequent follow-up is required (e.g., due to previous non-compliance, need for additional support, comorbidities such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, cancer, ...)
- Participation in an interventional Trial with an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device
- Pregnant patients at screening should be excluded. If the participant becomes pregnant during the study, case-by-case will be evaluated. Study participation or stop should be a mutual decision after clear discussion between physician and patient.
Participants who meet one or more of the above exclusion criteria must not proceed to be enrolled/randomized in the Trial and will be identified via applicable log forms in Investigator Site File.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Remote monitoring group Remote monitoring This group will follow the remote monitoring programme.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient safety measured as the number of patients not requiring unplanned IBD related hospital visits (outpatient clinic, emergency department, hospitalization, or surgery) or rescue therapy with steroids within two years. Two years Non-inferiority trial: patient safety in the remote monitoring programme must be at least equal to patient safety in standard of care.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of patients refusing to participate in this trial and the reason why. Two years Patients refusing to participate and reason
System usability in the intervention group. Two years System usability scale: is a simple, ten-item attitude Likert scale giving a global view of subjective assessments of usability. Each question has to be scored with a score of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). A high total score, means high system usability.
Time saving for patients in the intervention group versus the control group will be measured using a "timing questionnaire". Two years Time savings
Number of telephone/email contacts with the IBD team within one year and within two years. Two years Contact moments with IBD team
Quality of life in the intervention group versus the control group will be measured using the European Quality of Live Five Dimension Five Level Scale. Two years European Quality of Live Five Dimension Five Level Scale: Aside from general questions regarding the patient's wellbeing, this questionnaire also contains a scale on which "current health" has to be scored with a score between 0 (verry sick) and 100 (perfect health).
Costs and cost savings for hospital, RIZIV, employer, patient, … in the intervention group versus the control group. Two years costs and cost savings
Number of contacts with the general practitioner for IBD related reasons within one year and within two years. Two years Number of contacts with GP
Absence at work or school within one year and within two years in the intervention group versus the control group will be measured using the WPAI IBD questionnaire. Two years WPAI
Patient's compliance, measured via missing data in the intervention versus the control group Two years * Number of patients filling out the PRO questionnaire every three months.
* Number of patients with a fecal calprotectin analysis every three months.
* Number of patients with a blood test performed every year / three months (in case of patients under thiopurines or methotrexate).Reasons to stop remote monitoring. Two years The patient can always withdraw consent for participation in the ROADMAP study. In such a case, the investigator will try to collect information on the reason for withdrawing consent.
Another reason to stop remote monitoring might be that the treating physician decided that it was safer and in the best interest of the patient to stop the remote monitoring programme.Satisfaction with the program in the intervention group. Two years Patient satisfaction questionnaire. We will ask patients about their satisfaction with the remote monitoring programme.