Guiding Opioid Administration by Nociception Level Index (NOL) in Patients with Regional Anesthesia

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Analgesia, Postoperative; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Opioid Use; Nociceptive Pain; Pain, Postoperative

• Registration Number: NCT06905340
• Lead Sponsor: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Brief Summary

General anesthesia consists of a combination of hypnotic drugs to achieve unconsciousness and opioid analgesics to ensure antinociception. An alternative approach to the intraoperative administration of high potency opioids to achieve antinociception during surgery is combining general anesthesia with regional anesthesia. Modern general anesthesia aims to avoid an overdose of opioid analgesics and reduce side-effects of opioid administration. Quality and safety of general anesthesia are of major clinical importance and can be improved by adjusting the opioid analgesics to the optimal individual dose needed.

In current clinical practice, opioid dosage is usually determined by clinical judgment. However, different monitoring devices estimating the effect of nociception during unconsciousness have become commercially available. One of the most recent commercially available nociception indices is the Nociception Level Index (NOL). Until today, there is conflicting evidence on whether guiding sufentanil administration by NOL monitoring, which is the intended use of the nociception index, affects postoperative pain level in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the amount of postoperatively administered opioids, and the quality of postoperative recovery in patients with a combination of general and regional anesthesia. This study aims to investigate the clinical performance of intraoperative NOL monitoring and determines whether guiding sufentanil administration by NOL monitoring - compared to routine care - reduces either postoperative pain level in the PACU, postoperative opioid consumption in the PACU or postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after the operation in patients having trauma and orthopedic surgery with combined general and regional anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Modern general anesthesia aims to treat nociception induced by surgical stimulation while avoiding an overdose of opioid analgesics and reducing side-effects of opioid administration.

Underdosing of opioids during surgery can lead to nociception with increased sympathetic tone, elevated levels of stress hormones, unintended patient movement as well as increased postoperative pain. On the other hand, overdosing of opioids can lead to negative side effects such as nausea and vomiting, arterial hypotension, immunosuppression, prolonged recovery times, postoperative delirium and an increase in postoperative pain by opioid-induced-hyperalgesia. Anesthesiologists therefore aim to strike the balance between an effective and long-lasting perioperative anesthesia/analgesia, and keeping the intra- and postoperative opioid dosage as high as needed, but as low as possible to reduce adverse effects. An alternative approach to the intraoperative administration of high potency opioids aimed at antinociception during surgery is combining general anesthesia with regional anesthesia. By combining the two, the anesthesiologists aim to reduce intraoperative and postoperative opioid administration without compromising reflex control of the autonomous nervous system, immobility of the surgical site without patients' defensive movements, a pain free awakening after surgery and a pain free postoperative recovery.

Critically, the quality of regional anesthesia cannot be assessed during general anesthesia by the anesthesiologist, and patients cannot express their pain themselves. Therefore, anesthesiologists tend to administer a certain calculated opioid dose during the operation. Whether this calculated opioid administration is essential for a sufficient anesthesia or is an unnecessary overdose cannot be assessed by the anesthesiologist. To this day, there has been no measurement tool that could estimate the effectiveness of regional anesthesia and the absence of nociception during general anesthesia combined with regional anesthesia.

In recent years, different monitoring devices estimating the effect of nociception during unconsciousness have become commercially available. Such monitoring devices should help physicians to choose the right dose of opioid analgesics during general anesthesia with nociception indices. Among those, the Nociception Level Index (NOL) developed by Medasense Biometrics Ltd, Ramat Yishai, Israel is one of the most promising nociception indices regarding a possible improvement of postoperative patient recovery. This commercial available nociception index has been developed for guiding intraoperative sufentanil administration, has received CE certification for the EU area und an approval by the FDA. The NOL is based on the four physiological parameters heart rate variability, pulseplethysmographic amplitude, skin conductance and skin temperature, which are all measured with a non-invasive finger sensor. A proprietary algorithm generates the NOL from the changes in the four parameters over time using a non-linear random forest regression method through machine learning.

The dimensionless index is presented on a scale from 0 (low sympathetic tone) to 100 (high sympathetic tone) caused by nociception during surgery. According to the manufacturer, a value above 25 indicates a clinically relevant nociceptive response to noxious stimulus while a value below 10 during an operation lasting for more than 2 minutes indicates excessively high analgesia.

Nevertheless, the current literature remains inconclusive about the impact of NOL-guided opioid administration. There is conflicting evidence on the anesthesia-related outcome parameters postoperative pain level, intraoperatively and postoperatively administered amount of opioids, postoperative short-term recovery, and long-term outcome. No study has yet evaluated whether one may estimate the effectiveness of regional anesthesia during general anesthesia by monitoring the intraoperative nociception with the NOL. If the NOL was able to assess nociception, NOL-guided opioid administration could possibly reduce postoperative pain level in the PACU, postoperative opioid consumption in the PACU and postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after the operation on the ward. Such a reduction of the perioperative opioid dose would constitute a clinically important benefit for patients when considering the previously detailed risks of overdosing opioid analgesics as well as the context of perioperatively developed opioid addiction. Nevertheless, it remains unknown whether guiding sufentanil administration by NOL monitoring affects the administered amount of intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, immediate postoperative pain in the PACU and the quality of postoperative recovery, which is the intended use of the nociception index, in patients with a combination of general and regional anesthesia.

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the clinical performance of intraoperative NOL monitoring and determines whether guiding sufentanil administration by NOL monitoring - compared to routine care - reduces either postoperative pain level in the PACU, postoperative opioid consumption in the PACU or postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after the operation in patients undergoing trauma and orthopedic surgery with a combination of general and regional anesthesia. The hypothesis tested in the present study is that in patients having trauma and orthopedic surgery with a combination of general and regional anesthesia, administration of sufentanil guided by NOL monitoring reduces either postoperative pain level in the PACU, postoperative opioid consumption in the PACU or postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after the operation compared to routine care.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2025-03
• Study First Submitted: 2025-03-25
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-03-25
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-03-25
• Study Start: 2025-04
• Study First Posted: 2025-04-01
• Last Update Posted: 2025-04-01
• Primary Completion: 2025-12
• Study Completion: 2026-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 240

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients undergoing elective trauma or orthopedic surgery with a combination of general and regional anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

• Preexisting therapy with cardiac glycosides or pacemakers
• Cardiac arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block > I°)
• Chronic opioid misuse
• Intraoperative treatment with ketamine, beta-adrenergic agonists or clonidine
• Serious peripheral or cardiac autonomic neuropathy
• Inabilitiy to specify the postoperative pain level
• Postoperative treatment in an ICU

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Postoperative pain level in the PACU	1 day	Compares the postoperative pain level (NRS 0-10) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between groups.
Postoperative administered dose of opioids during the PACU stay	1 day	Compares the postoperative administered dose of opioids in morphine equivalents during the PACU stay (mg) between the groups.
Postoperative administered dose of opioids in the first 24 hours after the operation	2 days	Compares the postoperative administered dose of opioids in morphine equivalents in the first 24 hours after the operation (mg) between the groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Intraoperative norepinephrine consumption	1 day	Compares intraoperative cumulative dose of norepinephrine consumption \[μg/kg/min\] between the groups.
Time to extubation	1 day	Compares the time from end of narcotics to extubation \[min\] between the groups.
Intraoperative sufentanil consumption	1 day	Compares intraoperative sufentanil consumption \[μg/kg/min\] between the groups.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)	1 day	Compares the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (%) between the groups.
PACU stay	1 day	Compares the length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (min) between the groups.
Postoperative pain level 24 hours after the operation	1 day	Compares the postoperative pain level at rest 24 hours after the operation (NRS 0-10) between the groups.
Quality-of-Recovery QoR-15 Score	2 days	Compares the quality of postoperative recovery measured by the Quality-of-Recovery QoR-15 Score (0-120 points) 24 hours after the operation between the groups.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Anesthesiology; Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf; 🇩🇪 Hamburg, Germany