Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study
- Conditions
- Basilar Artery EmbolismBasilar Artery OcclusionBasilar Artery ThrombosisStrokeStroke of Basilar ArteryCerebrovascular Disorders
- Registration Number
- NCT01717755
- Lead Sponsor
- Erik van der Hoeven
- Brief Summary
Rationale: Recently our study group reported the results of the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS), a prospective registry of patients with an acute symptomatic basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Our observations in the BASICS registry underscore that we continue to lack a proven treatment modality for patients with an acute BAO and that current clinical practice varies widely. Furthermore, the often-held assumption that intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) is superior to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with an acute symptomatic BAO is challenged by our data. The BASICS registry was observational and has all the limitations of a non-randomised study. Interpretation of results is hampered by the lack of a standard treatment protocol for all patients who entered the study.
Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of IAT in addition to best medical management (BMM) in patients with basilar artery occlusion.
Study design: Randomised, multi-centre, open label, controlled phase III, treatment trial.
Study population: Patients, aged 18 years and older, with CTA or MRA confirmed basilar occlusion.
Intervention: Patients will be randomised between BMM with additional IAT versus BMM alone. IAT has to be initiated within 6 hours from estimated time of BAO. If treated with as part of BMM, IVT should be started within 4.5 hours of estimated time of BAO.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Favorable outcome at day 90 defined as a modified Rankin Score (mRS - functional scale) of 0-3.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 282
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Favourable outcome day 90 Favourable outcome at day 90 defined as a modified Rankin Score (mRS - functional scale) of 0-3.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method EQ-5D day 90 and 12 months EQ-5D (quality of life) at day 90 and at 12 months.
Excellent outcome day 90 Excellent outcome at day 90 defined as a modified Rankin Score (mRS - functional scale) of 0-2.
Modified Rankin Score day 90 Modified Rankin Score - not dichotomized.
NIHSS pre IVT, pre randomization, 24h post treatment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS - acute assessment scale) at timepoints:
* directly pre intravenous thrombolysis
* directly pre randomization (post intravenous thrombolysis)
* at 24 hours +- 6 hours post treatment.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (27)
Fortaleza General Hospital
🇧🇷Fortaleza, Brazil
Hospital das Clinicas de Ribeirao Preto
🇧🇷Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
Klinikum Augsburg
🇩🇪Augsburg, Germany
Berlin Charite Hospital
🇩🇪Berlin, Germany
Dresden University Hospital
🇩🇪Dresden, Germany
University Medical Center Mannheim
🇩🇪Mannheim, Germany
Oberschwabenklinik
🇩🇪Ravensburg, Germany
Bergamo Hospital
🇮🇹Bergamo, Italy
Genova Hospital
🇮🇹Genua, Italy
University Hospital Modena
🇮🇹Modena, Italy
Scroll for more (17 remaining)Fortaleza General Hospital🇧🇷Fortaleza, BrazilF Mont AlverneContact