AURORAX-0087A: GAG Scores for Surveillance of Recurrence in Leibovich Points ≥5 Non-metastatic ccRCC
- Conditions
- Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: GAG score
- Registration Number
- NCT04006405
- Lead Sponsor
- Elypta
- Brief Summary
AUR87A is an observational prospective multicenter diagnostics test cohort study for detection of renal cell carcinoma recurrence as determined by the reference standard, which is imaging using computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen at defined intervals after primary surgery.
- Detailed Description
Non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) recur in \~20% of cases within 5 years after radical surgery. Current postoperative follow-up protocols, being schematic and at best based on risk of recurrence scores, are sub-optimal for early detection of recurrences which could potentially be available for curative management. Blood and urine collected glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are promising novel class of biomarkers from which a new diagnostic test based on so called GAG scores has been developed. GAG scores have accurately distinguished localized/locally-advanced and advanced RCC from healthy subjects.
AUR87A features an adaptive design. The primary endpoint analysis is conducted when 30 events (i.e. recurrences) are reached - expected at 140 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (cohort 1). An interim analysis at 15 events is conducted to verify whether the sensitivity and specificity estimates are in line with the study assumptions. In case of futility, the GAG scores formulations and/or cut-offs are optimized based on data from cohort 1. The primary endpoints are then validated on a second independent cohort, powered depending on the results from cohort 1. This second cohort is estimated in 140 patients (cohort 2). In case of non-futility, cohort 2 may be used as external validation.
AUR87A will prospectively enroll an estimated 280 non-metastatic ccRCC patients curatively treated with surgery (partial or radical nephrectomy). Patients are followed-up longitudinally using GAG scores in blood and urine every 3 months after surgery, alongside the current standard follow-up protocol, i.e. imaging, as reference standard.
The hypothesis of AUR87A is that postoperative increase of the GAG scores, so called "GAG recurrence ", can predict or detect recurrence at an earlier time-point compared to the reference standard, referred to as "radiological recurrence", and thereby improve the clinical utility of current follow-up protocols.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 280
Pre-screening inclusion criteria
- Size of primary tumor >4cm (>cT1a) in greatest dimension on pre-operative abdominal CT-scan
- Size of primary tumor ≤4cm is allowed if pre-operative abdominal CT-scan shows suspected RCCs with radiological sign of venous tumor thrombus (renal vein or caval).
- Pre-operative CT-scan of chest and abdomen show no signs of metastatic disease
- Localized and biopsy proven clear cell RCC (ccRCC) under active surveillance which at timepoint of study recruitment, opted for surgery because of growth rate of primary tumor to a size > 4cm
- Elected for curative intent surgery for RCC
Final screening inclusion criteria
- Any gender being 18 years or older at timepoint of final inclusion
- In postoperative pathology report shown to be ccRCC subtype according to 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)
- Leibovich points (LP) ≥5 according to Leibovich score system (2003)
- If pathology report shows multiple subtypes in same tumor, as long as the majority of tumor is ccRCC (>50%), participant can be included
Pre-screening exclusion criteria
- TNM-stage T(any) N(any) M1 according to AJCC, i.e. metastatic disease at diagnosis
- Absence of preoperative chest imaging (chest CT) within 60 days prior to primary surgery
- Previous history of curatively treated for other cancers, still not deemed fully cured and participant still under surveillance for said cancer
- Participants offered active surveillance for RCC instead of curative intent surgery
- Participants offered any type of thermal ablation treatment instead of surgery, i.e. LP cannot be assessed
Final screening exclusion criteria
- Participants with AJCC cN0 status at preoperative imaging in whom a clinically suspicious regional lymph-node metastases (enlarged lymph node(s)) is noted during primary surgery, but who subsequently do not undergo any lymph node dissection. (Note: participants with cN0 status at pre-operative imaging and no clinical signs of regional lymph node metastases during primary surgery can still be included irrespective of lymph node dissection having been performed, i.e. being pN0 or pN1 if it is performed or pNx if it is not performed)
- Participants with AJCC cN1 status at pre-operative imaging in which lymph node dissection is not performed (i.e. pNx).
- Elected for any adjuvant therapy (i.e. systemic therapy) outside or within any clinical study
- Non-clear cell RCC histology or benign tumor (i.e. oncocytoma and angiomyolipoma, which are the most common benign types, but also any other rare types of benign renal tumors) after pathological analysis
- Any hereditary form of RCC (e.g. Von Hippel-Lindau, Birt-Hogg-Dubé, Hereditary Papillary RCC)
- RCC with pure sarcomatoid differentiation, also called sarcoma of the kidney
- Previous history of curatively treated for RCC with a suspected de novo RCC in the remaining kidney tissue
- Prior or current use of instillation therapy with hyaluronic acid and/or chondroitin sulfate (HA-CS).
- Use of heparin, including low molecular weight heparin (e.g. Enoxaparin, Dalteparin, Tinzaparin) for concurrent disease in need of blood dilution (e.g. ongoing deep vein thrombosis or lung emboli). Note: use of of heparin for thrombus prophylaxis in conjunction with primary surgery or postoperatively ≤4 weeks will be allowed.
- Patients who were not radically operated during primary surgery with the exception of histological positive surgical margin in participants who have undergone partial nephrectomy.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cohort 1 GAG score 140 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months Cohort 2 GAG score up to 140 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Sensitivity and specificity of GAG recurrence minimum follow-up of 12 months Sensitivity and specificity of GAG recurrence to LP≥5 ccRCC radiological or histologically verified recurrence with a minimum follow-up time of 12 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Absolute and relative risk increase (ARI/RRI) of radiological recurrence within 6 months since last GAG score evaluation Absolute and relative risk increase (ARI/RRI) of radiological recurrence in patients with GAG recurrence versus no GAG recurrence
Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of GAG scores minimum follow-up of 12 months Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of GAG scores to LP ≥5 ccRCC radiological recurrence
RFS, overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) follow-up time of 2 years and 5 years respectively after primary surgery RFS, overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) in patients with GAG recurrence versus no GAG recurrence
Concordance-index (C-index) of preoperative GAG scores follow-up time of 2 years and 5 years respectively after primary surgery Concordance-index (C-index) of preoperative GAG scores versus risk nomograms for RFS and for CSS
Positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) of GAG recurrence minimum follow-up of 12 months Positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) of GAG recurrence to LP ≥5 ccRCC radiological recurrence
Lead-time GAG vs. radiological recurrence among true positives minimum follow-up of 12 months Lead-time GAG vs. radiological recurrence among true positives
Recurrence-free survival (RFS) minimum follow-up of 12 months Recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the LP≥5 ccRCC for GAG recurrence vs. no GAG recurrence with a minimum follow-up time of 12 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (29)
MD Anderson Cancer Center
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Prostate Cancer Centre
🇨🇦Calgary, Canada
Aarhus University Hospital
🇩🇰Aarhus, Denmark
UZ Leuven
🇧🇪Leuven, Belgium
University Hospital of Valencia
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain
Norrlands University Hospital
🇸🇪Umeå, Sweden
Emory University School of Medicine
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Odense University Hospital
🇩🇰Odense, Denmark
Zealand University Hospital
🇩🇰Roskilde, Denmark
Helsinki University Central Hospital
🇫🇮Helsinki, Finland
Hôpital Henri Mondor
🇫🇷Créteil, France
AOU San Orsola Malpighi
🇮🇹Bologna, Italy
Careggi University Hospital
🇮🇹Florence, Italy
San Raffaele Hospital
🇮🇹Milano, Italy
AOU San Luigi Gonzaga
🇮🇹Orbassano, Italy
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena
🇮🇹Roma, Italy
AOU Integrata Verona
🇮🇹Verona, Italy
Hospital da Luz Coimbra
🇵🇹Coimbra, Portugal
Hospital Universitario Cabueñes
🇪🇸Gijón, Spain
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
🇸🇪Gothenburg, Sweden
Addenbrooke's Hospital
🇬🇧Cambridge, United Kingdom
Western General Hospital
🇬🇧Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Frimley Park Hospital
🇬🇧Frimley, United Kingdom
Guys & St Thomas Hospital
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Royal Free Hospital
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital
🇬🇧Norwich, United Kingdom
Royal Berkshire Hospital
🇬🇧Reading, United Kingdom
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
🇬🇧Salford, United Kingdom