Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02281903
NCT02281903
Completed
Not Applicable

Is Chest Compressions Using the TrueCPRTM Feedback Device More Effective Than Manual Compressions During Pediatric Resuscitation? A Manikin Study

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education1 site in 1 country132 target enrollmentOctober 2014
ConditionsCardiac Arrest

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cardiac Arrest
Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Enrollment
132
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Effective compressions compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the TrueCPR feedback device (with metronome) to standard basic life support (BLS) in terms of the quality of single rescuer pediatric resuscitation. Therefore, our hypothesis was that there would be no difference between both CPR methods in terms of chest compression quality parameters.

Detailed Description

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death worldwide. High-quality chest compressions are of paramount importance for survival and good neurological outcome. Unfortunately, even health professionals have difficulty performing effective CPR. Chest compression (CC) is often too shallow, compression ratio is inadequate, and hands-off time is too long. CPR feedback devices might be an option for rescuers to in order to increase CC efficiency.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2014
End Date
November 2014
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Lukasz Szarpak

Lukasz Szarpak

National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • medical profession (paramedics, nurses, physicians) or medical students (nurses, paramedics, physicians)

Exclusion Criteria

  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Effective compressions compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions

Time Frame: 1 month

effective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions

Secondary Outcomes

  • effective compressions ratio effective compressions [%] multiplied by flow time [%](1 month)
  • absolute hands-off time sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation(1 month)
  • Flow time sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed.(1 month)
  • Compression depth compression in correct depth (40-50mm) measured by the software is connected to the manikin and computer(1 month)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials