Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02283034
NCT02283034
Unknown
Not Applicable

Quality of Chest Compressions During 8 Min of Single-rescuer Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With Five Different CPR Feedback Devices. Randomised Crossover Manikin Trial

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education1 site in 1 country120 target enrollmentOctober 2014
ConditionsCardiac Arrest

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cardiac Arrest
Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Enrollment
120
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Effective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare five CPR feedback devices to standard BLS in terms of the quality of single rescuer pediatric resuscitation. Therefore, the investigators hypothesis was that there would be no difference between CPR methods in terms of chest compression quality parameters.

Detailed Description

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death worldwide. High-quality chest compressions are of paramount importance for survival and good neurological outcome. Unfortunately, even health professionals have difficulty performing effective CPR. Chest compression (CC) is often too shallow, compression ratio is inadequate, and hands-off time is too long. CPR feedback devices might be an option for rescuers to in order to increase CC efficiency.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2014
End Date
November 2014
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Lukasz Szarpak

Lukasz Szarpak

National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • medical profession (paramedics, nurses, physicians) or medical students (nurses, paramedics, physicians)

Exclusion Criteria

  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Effective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions

Time Frame: 1 month

effective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions

Secondary Outcomes

  • Chest compression depth(1 month)
  • Chest compression rate(1 month)
  • effective compressions ratio was defined as effective compressions [%] multiplied by flow time [%](1 month)
  • Flow time was defined as the sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed(1 month)
  • absolute hands-off time was defined as the sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation(1 month)
  • VAS (visual analogue scale)(1 month)
  • Prefered CPR device(1 month)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials