MedPath

Pediatric Resuscitation With Feedback Devices

Not Applicable
Conditions
Cardiac Arrest
Registration Number
NCT02294721
Lead Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare four different CPR feedback devices to standard BLS in terms of the quality of single rescuer pediatric resuscitation. Therefore, the investigators hypothesis was that there would be no difference between CPR methods in terms of chest compression quality parameters.

Detailed Description

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death worldwide. High-quality chest compressions are of paramount importance for survival and good neurological outcome. Unfortunately, even health professionals have difficulty performing effective CPR. Chest compression (CC) is often too shallow, compression ratio is inadequate, and hands-off time is too long. CPR feedback devices might be an option for rescuers to in order to increase CC efficiency.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • medical profession (nurses)
Exclusion Criteria
  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Effective compressions1 day

Effective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Chest compression depth1 day

To measure chest compression depth during 8 minutes. Chest compression depth will be measured using the software connected to the manikin and computer

Chest compression rate1 day

To measure the chest compression rate during 8 minutes. Chest compression rate will be measured using the software connected to the manikin and computer

effective compressions ratio1day

effective compressions ratio was defined as effective compressions \[%\] multiplied by flow time \[%\]

Flow time was defined as the sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed1 day

flow time was defined as the sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed.

absolute hands-off time1 day

absolute hands-off time (HOT) was defined as the sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation

VAS (visual analogue scale)1 day

after having completed the 8 min testing period, the study participants were asked how challenging they had experienced standard BLS or resuscitation which the respective feedback device. answers were rated on a 10-point Lickert scale (most difficult = 1 to easiest = 10)

Prefered CPR device1 day

after having completed the 8 min testing period, the study participants were asked how chellenging whitch method they would preferred. answers were rated on a 10-point Lickert scale (lower preferred = 1 to most preferred = 10)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

🇵🇱

Warsaw, Masovia, Poland

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
🇵🇱Warsaw, Masovia, Poland
Lukasz Szarpak
Principal Investigator
Andrzej Kurowski
Sub Investigator
Lukasz Czyżewski
Sub Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.