CAP'Onco : Psychological and Social Consultation of Professional Accompaniment in Oncology

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Cancer

Interventions: Other: Psychological and Social Consultation

Registration Number: NCT03302767

Lead Sponsor: Institut Bergonié

Brief Summary: This patient support system is designed to help patients regain their professional activity after their treatment. It's a 3-Axis neuropsycho-social synergy on 3 axes:

* A weekly pluridisciplinary consultation in tandem (Social worker + Psychologist / Neuropsychologist)

* Monthly information meetings and workshops (TIC'Onco reunions: collective information times and Cogit'Onco workshops: cognitive workshops

* An information booklet "Prepare the work return" The aim of this research is to evaluate efficiency in term of quality of life improvement linked to work status, utility, feasibility and patients' satisfaction.

The aim of this research is to evaluate efficiency in term of quality of life improvement linked to work status, utility, feasibility and patients' satisfaction.

Detailed Description: Unmet need characterize in 4 points:

* Cancer and survival: challenges for cancer patients who want to work while being treated

* Cancer and career: Job instability for cancer patients

* Difficulties and isolation of patients due to a lack of coordination between healthcare professionals and colleagues/management

* Post-treatment cognitive troubles stress and hindered patient return to employment: chemo brain This research-action will propose and evaluate a concrete device: To maintain a professional activity with the support of CAP'Onco during treatment, to balance between quality of life, managing the "cancer event" and the psychosocial consequences for professional experience, to provide an early, durable and multimodal support to improve work keeping and anticipate return to employment

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 29

Inclusion Criteria

Patients attending the Institut Bergonié
Informed Consent signed.
Patients affiliated to a French social
living in Gironde
Professional activity at the time of diagnosis
Treated for - breast cancer, Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (non-cerebral), testicular cancer
CURATIVE support
At any time during treatment (chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or immunotherapy)

Exclusion Criteria

Patient deprived of liberty or subject to a legal protection measure
History of cancers
Cerebral pathology and / or brain metastasis

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Psychological and Social Consultation	Psychological and Social Consultation	Psychological and Social Consultation

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores	At baseline and 5 months	Standardised QLQ-C30 scoring according to EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. 2001). 15 dimensions are presented below. Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores	At baseline and 5 months	Cognitive complaints were evaluated by using the french Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) scale version 3 Assessed using median total score (range 0-132) and median scores of these 4 dimensions : * Perceived Cognitive Impairment (range 0-72) * Impact on quality of life (range 0-16) * Comments from others (range 0-16) * Perceived Cognitive Skills (range 0-28) Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.
Professional Recovery Scale Scores	At baseline and 5 months	Professional recovery was evaluated by using the Scale of motivation to Professional recovery. This scale was constructed for the needs of this exploratory research and has for vocation a later validation. It includes 62 questions and was assessed using median scores of these 7 dimensions : * Work and administrative process (0-100) * Positioning in relation to the job-post-mission (0-100) * Emotion and work (0-100) * Labour relations (0-100) * Work and physical/intellectual conditions (0-100) * Privacy and work (0-100) * Return to work (0-20) Higher scores represent better outcomes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores	At baseline and 5 months	Tiredness was evaluated by using the Piper Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) revised scale Assessed using median total score (range 0-10) and median scores of these 4 tiredness dimensions : * Behavioural * Emotional * Sensory * Cognitive-mood Each dimension has range 0-10 with following interpretation: higher scores indicate greater severity of fatigue
Anxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale Scores	At baseline and 5 months	Anxio-depressive troubles were evaluated by using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale. Assessed using median scores of these 2 dimensions : * Anxiety * Depression Each dimension has range 0-21 with following interpretation: higher scores represent worse outcomes (0-7 normal; 8-10 mild; 11-14 moderate; 15-21 severe)