KTP vs CO2 Laser for the Treatment of Laryngeal Carcinoma
- Conditions
- Laryngeal Neoplasms
- Interventions
- Device: CO2 laserDevice: KTP laser
- Registration Number
- NCT02672904
- Lead Sponsor
- Kaplan Medical Center
- Brief Summary
comparison results of treatment of early stage glottic cancer between two methods of surgical treatment - CO2 laser and KTP laser
- Detailed Description
Randomized controlled double-blinded study. The study group includes patients diagnosed with early glottic cancer, either carcinoma in situ or T1a-b,N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma.
Patients will undergo examination and treatment and at least 3 years of follow-up.
40 cancer patients will be included. The participants will be randomly divided into two groups: the first will be treated by KTP laser and the second by CO2 laser.
The patients will be blinded to the method of treatment. To enable double-blinding, the investigator performing the surgery would be the only one knowing which research group the patient belongs to. The investigator in charge of collecting the data after the operation will be blinded to the treatment method.
Each participant will undergo pre-operative evaluation and follow-up after surgery in both arms.
Preoperative evaluation will include:
* Voice Handicap Index questionnaire
* GRBAS - subjective assessment of voice quality.
* Video-stroboscopy of vocal cords
* Voice Analysis .
Follow-up after surgery:
* Visit 6 weeks after surgery (± two weeks), and then every three months (± 6 weeks).
* repeated full evaluation (questionnaire, GRBAS, Stroboscopy, voice analysis) in 30 weeks of follow up and 3 years of follow up.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- Patients with pre-operative diagnosis of squamous cell cancer of the vocal cords at an early stage ( Carcinoma in situ or T1-glottic carcinoma).
- Patients who underwent previous significant vocal cords surgical intervention , or irradiation.
- Contraindications to any endoscopic surgical treatment (general health condition, patient refusal, technical surgical difficulties)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description CO2 laser CO2 laser Patients undergoing endoscopic treatment with CO2 laser KTP laser KTP laser Patients undergoing endoscopic treatment with KTP laser
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method number of surgical interventions 3 years total number of surgical interventions needed to eliminate the disease
Cure rates in terms of local, regional or distant recurrence events 3 years after last intervention evidence of malignant disease in the larynx, cervical lymph nodes or distant metastases
Overall survival and disease-dependent survival over a period of at least 3 years 3 years after last intervention voice quality results In the short term 6 month after last intervention objective measurement- voice lab analysis, and subjective measurement- Voice Handicap Index questionnaire
voice quality results In the long term 3 years after last intervention objective measurement- voice lab analysis, and subjective measurement- Voice Handicap Index questionnaire
Duration of surgery intraoperative total time (minutes) of surgical procedure
Recovery time after surgery up to 3 years recovery in terms of overall function, breathing, swallowing and vocal communication
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Kapkan medical center
🇮🇱Rehovot, Israel