Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03237637
NCT03237637UnknownPhase 3

Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Atenolol and Propranolol in the Treatment of Infantile Hemangiomas

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: March 24, 2017Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Mean difference in number of patients achieving complete clinical clearance of lesion (PGA Score of 5) in the two groups

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Through this study, the investigators shall compare the effectiveness of atenolol with propranolol in the treatment of IH. In addition, the investigators shall try to elucidate the mechanism of action of beta blockers by assessing their action on triggers such as hypoxia. The study design will be a parallel group comparative study wherein patients of IH will be randomized into two groups. One group will receive propranolol and the other atenolol for a maximum period of 9 months. The patients will then be followed up regularly for regression of the IH based on Physician global assessment, hemangioma activity score(HAS), serial photography and lesional ultrasonography. Any side effects encountered during the treatment period will also be noted. Also serial measurements of hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha(HIF-1α) will be made to ascertain the mechanism of action of the drugs.

Detailed Description

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:

  1. To compare the effectiveness and safety of oral atenolol versus oral propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas.
  2. To elucidate the mechanism of action of atenolol and propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas.

STUDY DESIGN MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This investigator-initiated, prospective, observer blinded, parallel group comparative study on the effect of oral medication in infantile cutaneous hemangiomas is being conducted in the Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, and Pediatric Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, after getting approval from the institutional Research and Ethics Committee.

Sample size: As this is a pilot study, an arbitrary sample size of 60 (30 in each group) was decided to be kept.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
— to 12 Months (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Children diagnosed with problematic infantile hemangiomas
  • Potentially disfiguring infantile hemangiomas at any site.
  • Functionally threatening infantile hemangiomas near the eyes, nose, natural orifices, limbs, genitalia.
  • Ulcerated infantile hemangiomas.
  • Segmental infantile hemangiomas.
  • Uncomplicated progressive infantile hemangiomas with unpredictable future course.
  • Age group: less than 1 year of age.
  • Multiple hemangiomas

Exclusion Criteria

  • Infants with heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias
  • Broncho -obstructive disease.
  • Premature infants with corrected age less than 40 weeks.
  • Known hypoglycemia
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Hypertension
  • Hypotension
  • Liver failure
  • Visceral hemangiomas
  • PHACES syndrome

Arms & Interventions

Group A- Propranolol

Active Comparator

Oral propranolol 1mg/kg/day as crushed tablets, in two divided doses, increased to 2mg/kg/day in two divided doses after 24 hours if tolerated well. Treatment will be stopped at complete clinical clearance of lesion (defined arbitrarily as >90% reduction in the size of Infantile Hemangioma as assessed by Physician Global Assessment) or after 9 months of treatment (primary end point) whichever is earlier.

Intervention: oral propranolol (Drug)

Group B- Atenolol

Experimental

Oral atenolol 0.5mg/kg as a single dose, increased to 1mg/kg as a single dose after 24 hours if tolerated well. Treatment will be stopped at complete clinical clearance of lesion (defined arbitrarily as >90% reduction in the size of Infantile Hemangioma as assessed by Physician Global Assessment) or after 9 months of treatment (primary end point) whichever is earlier.

Intervention: oral atenolol (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mean difference in number of patients achieving complete clinical clearance of lesion (PGA Score of 5) in the two groups

Time Frame: 9 months

Physician Global Assessment Responses to therapy (change of thickness, color, and area) will be recorded on each follow up.The therapeutic responses will be evaluated on a score of 1-5 as follows by an independent dermatologist who will not know the therapies: Score 5: \>90% improvement or complete clinical involution Score 4: excellent improvement(75-90% decrease) Score 3: good improvement(50-74% decrease) Score 2: minimal improvement( 25-49% decrease) Score 1: poor improvement(1-24% decrease) Score 0: failure (no difference or regrowth)

Mean difference in Hemangioma Activity Score in the two groups

Time Frame: 9 months

Hemangioma Activity score Patient name: Age: Location of infantile hemangioma: ("Bright red edge" should only be scored when the HOI is not totally "bright red" Skin colored after activity". Do not score in deep HOI (deep swelling) unless the HOI has changed into it after activity) Date Deep swelling: tense HOI(6) 'neutral' HOI at t=0 or less than 50% reduction at follow up(4) \>=50% reduction at follow up (2) No more swelling at follow up (0) Bright red/ shining red HOI(5) OR bright red edge(4) Matt red/reddish purple HOI/ matt red edge(3) Blue HOI or Blue shining through in deep HOI(2) Grey HOI(1) Skin colored after activity(0) Total score: Number of items scored Preliminary HAS= total score/number of items scored Ulcer=\<1cm2 (+0.5) Ulcer 1-25cm2(+1) Ulcer \>=25cm2(+2) HAS= preliminary HAS + ulcer score

Frequency of adverse effects (minor and serious) in the two groups

Time Frame: 9 months

Mean difference in number of days required to achieve complete clinical clearance of lesion (PGA Score of 5) in the two groups

Time Frame: 9 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mean difference in HIF-1α levels before and after treatment in Group A and Group B(9 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Raihan Ashraf

Junior Resident, Department of Dermatology

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials