MedPath

The Use of Microneedles to Expedite Treatment Time in Photodynamic Therapy

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Keratosis, Actinic
Interventions
Device: Microneedle Roller
Radiation: Blue Light
Registration Number
NCT02594644
Lead Sponsor
University of California, Davis
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate how varying incubation periods of topical aminolevulinic acid after pretreatment with microneedle application can facilitate the penetration and efficacy of photodynamic therapy.

Detailed Description

The current standard of care of photodynamic therapy to treat actinic keratoses includes pre-treatment of the area with topical aminolevulinic acid for 1 hour, followed by treatment with blue light. In a previous study, the investigators showed pretreatment of microneedles enhance penetration of topical aminolevulinic acid as compared to the control group.

The aim of this study is to investigate how varying incubation periods of topical aminolevulinic acid after pretreatment with microneedle application can facilitate the penetration and efficacy of photodynamic therapy.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
32
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Subjects has actinic keratoses and qualifies for photodynamic therapy
  • Do not meet any of the exclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects who smoke
  • Subjects who have a photosensitizing condition such as lupus, porphyria, or similar condition
  • Subjects who have established allergy to topical ALA
  • Subjects who have had a documented nonmelanoma skin cancer on the face over the past 6 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
10-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & ShamMicroneedle Roller10-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows.
20-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & ShamMicroneedle Roller20-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows.
10-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & ShamBlue Light10-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows.
20-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & ShamBlue Light20-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows.
10-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & ShamAminolevulinic Acid10-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows.
20-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & ShamAminolevulinic Acid20-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in the Percentage of Complete Clearance of the Actinic KeratosesBaseline, 2 Months

The primary endpoint will be the difference in the percentage of complete clearance of the actinic keratoses as an intraindividual comparison between the treatment groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual Analog Pain ScaleImmediately Post-Treatment

The secondary will be any pain associated with the microneedle pretreatment and with the application of the PDT using the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale pain grading. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of California-Davis, Department of Dermatology

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath