The Use of Microneedles to Expedite Treatment Time in Photodynamic Therapy
- Conditions
- Keratosis, Actinic
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT02594644
- Lead Sponsor
- University of California, Davis
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate how varying incubation periods of topical aminolevulinic acid after pretreatment with microneedle application can facilitate the penetration and efficacy of photodynamic therapy.
- Detailed Description
The current standard of care of photodynamic therapy to treat actinic keratoses includes pre-treatment of the area with topical aminolevulinic acid for 1 hour, followed by treatment with blue light. In a previous study, the investigators showed pretreatment of microneedles enhance penetration of topical aminolevulinic acid as compared to the control group.
The aim of this study is to investigate how varying incubation periods of topical aminolevulinic acid after pretreatment with microneedle application can facilitate the penetration and efficacy of photodynamic therapy.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 32
- 18 years of age and older
- Subjects has actinic keratoses and qualifies for photodynamic therapy
- Do not meet any of the exclusion criteria
- Subjects who smoke
- Subjects who have a photosensitizing condition such as lupus, porphyria, or similar condition
- Subjects who have established allergy to topical ALA
- Subjects who have had a documented nonmelanoma skin cancer on the face over the past 6 months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 10-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & Sham Microneedle Roller 10-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows. 20-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & Sham Microneedle Roller 20-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows. 10-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & Sham Blue Light 10-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows. 20-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & Sham Blue Light 20-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows. 10-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & Sham Aminolevulinic Acid 10-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows. 20-minute Incubation with Microneedle Roller & Sham Aminolevulinic Acid 20-minute topical aminolevulinic acid incubation group. Subjects randomized by binary randomization into each treatment group and undergo secondary binary randomization for microneedle roller treatment (vs. sham microneedle) to the right or left side of the face. Blue light therapy follows.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in the Percentage of Complete Clearance of the Actinic Keratoses Baseline, 2 Months The primary endpoint will be the difference in the percentage of complete clearance of the actinic keratoses as an intraindividual comparison between the treatment groups.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual Analog Pain Scale Immediately Post-Treatment The secondary will be any pain associated with the microneedle pretreatment and with the application of the PDT using the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale pain grading. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of California-Davis, Department of Dermatology
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States