跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/01/061281
CTRI/2024/01/061281
进行中(未招募)
不适用

Comparative Evaluation of Conventional versus nasopharyngeal airway guided bougie technique for nasotracheal intubation in adult patients planned for surgery under general anaesthesia.

Pt B D Sharma University of Health Sciences PGIMS1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2024年1月15日最近更新:

概览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
Pt B D Sharma University of Health Sciences PGIMS
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare both techniques in terms of Nasopharyngeal trauma.

概览

简要总结

This Study is to compare conventional technique with nasopharyngeal airway guided Bougie technique for nasotracheal intubation in adult patients planned for surgery under general anaesthesia, in terms of Nasopharyngeal Trauma, Ease of insertion of the endotracheal tube into nasopharynx, Intubation time, Number of attempts required, Maneuvers required and Success rate.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients of either sex, aged between 18 and 60 years belonging to ASA I & II posted for elective surgery under general anaesthesia.

排除标准

  • Refusal to consent.
  • Anticipated difficult airway.
  • Pregnant females.
  • History of recurrent epistaxis.
  • History of bleeding diathesis, Nasal trauma.
  • History of rhinoplasty or septoplasty.
  • Patients with nasal passage stenosis, nasal deformity, polyp, nasopharyngeal tumor.
  • Patients on anticoagulants, antiplatelets.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare both techniques in terms of Nasopharyngeal trauma.

时间窗: After Securing the Endotracheal tube Nasopharyngeal Trauma will be asses using 4×4 inch folded Gauze by Anaesthetist

次要结局

  • 1.Ease of insertion of the endotracheal tube into nasopharynx(2.Intubation time.)

研究者

发起方
Pt B D Sharma University of Health Sciences PGIMS
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr SK Singhal

Pt. B D Sharma PGIMS Rohtak

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验