Effect of Mindful Eating on Weight Management in Breast Cancer Survivors
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasm Female
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Mindful eating intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT03972540
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Georgia
- Brief Summary
This pilot study examined changes in anthropometric measures as a result of and feasibility/ acceptability of a mindful eating intervention for overweight and obese postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.
- Detailed Description
Being overweight is associated with increased risk for chronic disease and premature death in breast cancer survivors. This pilot study examined changes in anthropometric measures as a result of and feasibility/ acceptability of a mindful eating intervention for overweight and obese postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. The one-group pre-posttest study design included eight weekly group-based mindful eating sessions on strategies to intentionally and attentively consume food. Anthropometrics, blood pressure, mindfulness, nutritional intake, and physical activity were collected at baseline and 12-weeks follow-up. Data on feasibility and acceptability were collected at study completion.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 13
- Postmenopausal female
- Breast cancer survivor (in remission)
- Completed cancer treatment at the time of study enrollment
- Body Mass Index (BMI) equal or greater than 25 kg/m²
- None.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Mindful eating intervention Mindful eating intervention The mindful eating intervention was taught by a mindfulness-based stress reduction instructor certified by the Center of Mindfulness at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Blood Pressure Change measured between weeks 1 and 12 At the baseline and follow-up visits, trained study staff measured participants' systolic/diastolic blood pressure using a standardized protocol to the nearest mmHg. In order to ensure reliability, all measurements were taken 3 times and average values were used for analyses.
Acceptability of the Intervention Measured at week 12 To measure acceptability, participants were asked to complete a 5-question feedback survey to evaluate the mindful eating intervention at the follow-up study visit. Specifically, the open-ended survey questions asked participants about (1) their experience with intervention, (2) how the intervention affected diet and exercise management, (3) positive aspects about the intervention, (4) negative aspects about the intervention, and (5) suggested changes to the intervention. Qualitative data analysis techniques were used to identify themes within the data.
Body Mass Index Change measured between weeks 1 and 12 At the baseline and follow-up visits, trained study staff measured participants' weight and height using a standardized protocol. Height (measured by a stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm) and weight (measured by a scale to the nearest 0.1 kg) was used to calculate BMI (weight in kg divided by height in m²).
Feasibility of Conducting the Intervention Measured at week 12 Feasibility was assessed by tracking participant accrual and retention rates.
Waste and Hip Circumference Change measured between weeks 1 and 12 At the baseline and follow-up visits, trained study staff measured participants' waist and hip circumference by tape measure to the nearest 0.1 centimeter.
Body Fat Percentage Change measured between weeks 1 and 12 At the baseline and follow-up visits, trained study staff measured participants' body fat percentage using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mindful Eating Measures Change measured between weeks 1 and 12 Changes in mindfulness resulting from the intervention were measured using the validated Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). The MAAS questionnaire is a 15-item scale that was designed to assess mindfulness and receptive awareness throughout an individual's daily life. Scores from the MAAS range from 1 to 6, with higher scores associated with higher mindfulness. The MAAS was validated for use in cancer populations against the Profile of Mood States (POMS) scale that is widely used in clinical settings. Higher MAAS scores were significantly correlated with lower POMS scores, further confirming the construct validity of the MAAS questionnaire for assessing mindfulness in cancer populations. The questionnaire was self-administered to the participants pre and post intervention.