MedPath

Effect of Mindful Eating on Weight Management in Breast Cancer Survivors

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Breast Neoplasm Female
Interventions
Behavioral: Mindful eating intervention
Registration Number
NCT03972540
Lead Sponsor
University of Georgia
Brief Summary

This pilot study examined changes in anthropometric measures as a result of and feasibility/ acceptability of a mindful eating intervention for overweight and obese postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.

Detailed Description

Being overweight is associated with increased risk for chronic disease and premature death in breast cancer survivors. This pilot study examined changes in anthropometric measures as a result of and feasibility/ acceptability of a mindful eating intervention for overweight and obese postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. The one-group pre-posttest study design included eight weekly group-based mindful eating sessions on strategies to intentionally and attentively consume food. Anthropometrics, blood pressure, mindfulness, nutritional intake, and physical activity were collected at baseline and 12-weeks follow-up. Data on feasibility and acceptability were collected at study completion.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
13
Inclusion Criteria
  • Postmenopausal female
  • Breast cancer survivor (in remission)
  • Completed cancer treatment at the time of study enrollment
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) equal or greater than 25 kg/m²
Exclusion Criteria
  • None.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Mindful eating interventionMindful eating interventionThe mindful eating intervention was taught by a mindfulness-based stress reduction instructor certified by the Center of Mindfulness at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Blood PressureChange measured between weeks 1 and 12

At the baseline and follow-up visits, trained study staff measured participants' systolic/diastolic blood pressure using a standardized protocol to the nearest mmHg. In order to ensure reliability, all measurements were taken 3 times and average values were used for analyses.

Acceptability of the InterventionMeasured at week 12

To measure acceptability, participants were asked to complete a 5-question feedback survey to evaluate the mindful eating intervention at the follow-up study visit. Specifically, the open-ended survey questions asked participants about (1) their experience with intervention, (2) how the intervention affected diet and exercise management, (3) positive aspects about the intervention, (4) negative aspects about the intervention, and (5) suggested changes to the intervention. Qualitative data analysis techniques were used to identify themes within the data.

Body Mass IndexChange measured between weeks 1 and 12

At the baseline and follow-up visits, trained study staff measured participants' weight and height using a standardized protocol. Height (measured by a stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm) and weight (measured by a scale to the nearest 0.1 kg) was used to calculate BMI (weight in kg divided by height in m²).

Feasibility of Conducting the InterventionMeasured at week 12

Feasibility was assessed by tracking participant accrual and retention rates.

Waste and Hip CircumferenceChange measured between weeks 1 and 12

At the baseline and follow-up visits, trained study staff measured participants' waist and hip circumference by tape measure to the nearest 0.1 centimeter.

Body Fat PercentageChange measured between weeks 1 and 12

At the baseline and follow-up visits, trained study staff measured participants' body fat percentage using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mindful Eating MeasuresChange measured between weeks 1 and 12

Changes in mindfulness resulting from the intervention were measured using the validated Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). The MAAS questionnaire is a 15-item scale that was designed to assess mindfulness and receptive awareness throughout an individual's daily life. Scores from the MAAS range from 1 to 6, with higher scores associated with higher mindfulness. The MAAS was validated for use in cancer populations against the Profile of Mood States (POMS) scale that is widely used in clinical settings. Higher MAAS scores were significantly correlated with lower POMS scores, further confirming the construct validity of the MAAS questionnaire for assessing mindfulness in cancer populations. The questionnaire was self-administered to the participants pre and post intervention.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath