Minimizing Lung Injury During Laparoscopy in Steep Trendelenburg Position
- Conditions
- Atelectasis
- Interventions
- Procedure: Decremental PEEPDiagnostic Test: Lung ultrasound scoreDiagnostic Test: Blood gas analysisDiagnostic Test: Registration of respiratory mechanicsDiagnostic Test: Evaluation of dead space
- Registration Number
- NCT04900714
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Antwerp
- Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that the level of PEEP is often suboptimally applied in certain operative conditions, such as in laparoscopy with head down (Trendelenburg) positioning. This can result in excessive levels of lung stress and postoperative pulmonary complications.
In patients with steep Trendelenburg and a pneumoperitoneum, the investigators aim to
1. measure apical versus basal atelectasis using the lung ultrasound score
2. compare lung ultrasound scores at different PEEP levels
3. compare respiratory mechanics at the different PEEP levels
4. contrast the optimal PEEP level to standard practice
5. provide guidance to optimal PEEP titration in this setting for the clinician
- Detailed Description
The investigators hypothesize that the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is often incorrectly applied in certain operative conditions, such as in laparoscopy with head down (Trendelenburg) positioning. This can result in excessive levels of lung stress and postoperative pulmonary complications.
Incorrect intra-operative ventilator management can be harmful for the patient, potentially leading to postoperative pulmonary complications and ventilator-induced lung injury. During routine anesthesia procedures, most anesthetists will set the ventilator by rule of thumb with a PEEP of 4-6 cmH2O, a tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg of ideal body weight and a frequency of 10-15 breaths per minute in order to provide lung protective ventilation. However, due to recent advances in surgical practice, patients are more frequently placed in non- physiological states, such as Trendelenburg position up to 30° with concurrent pneumoperitoneum and intra-abdominal pressures of 15mmHg or higher, as in for example robot-assisted radical prostatectomy or gynecological procedures. This extreme positioning and increased intra-abdominal pressure can have a significant effect on respiratory mechanics and can potentially result in excessive lung stress. The changes in applied positive pressure ventilation will result in changes of regional ventilation: both an increased amount of atelectasis and an increased amount of regional hyperinflation are observed in this setting. The ideal PEEP level balances the recruitment of atelectasis versus excessive hyperinflation. These changes in regional ventilation can be assessed by lung ultrasound. The lung ultrasound score can distinguish atelectasis from normal aeration in the different lung regions of interest.
This project is designed as a single center cohort study. Non-obese (BMI \< 30kg/m2), lung-healthy non-pregnant, non-smoking individuals without right sided heart failure, scheduled for elective laparoscopy of the lower abdomen, will be recruited. Standardized induction and maintenance with propofol TCI (3-6μg/l plasma concentration as calculated by the Marsh model), sufentanil (0.2μg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6mg/kg) will be provided. Neuromuscular blockade will be monitored using a train-of-four (TOF) monitor and kept with a TOF count \< 1 throughout the study using additional doses if indicated. A radial arterial line will be placed. Mechanical ventilation will be provided in volume control mode with a tidal volume of 4-6 ml/kg of ideal body weight (IBW) aiming for a driving pressure ≤ 15cmH2O, a starting PEEP of 5cmH2O, a frequency of 12-18 breaths per minute titrated to the end-tidal CO2 measurement and an initial FiO2 of 0.4. An esophageal balloon catheter with pressure sensor will be used to calculate transpulmonary pressures. The balloon and pressure sensor will be calibrated as per manufacturers guideline. Respiratory parameters will be recorded and saved for later evaluation using the FluxMed GrT monitor and software (MBMED, Argentina). After inflation of the pneumoperitoneum, lung ultrasound will be performed bilaterally at the midclavicular line between the second and third ribs, at the posterior axillary line above the level of T4 and at the posterior axillary line closely superior to the diaphragm, thus retaining 6 ultrasound loops which will be saved for post-hoc lung ultrasound scoring. The lung ultrasound measurements will be repeated at different decremental levels of PEEP: 15, 10, 5 and 0 cmH2O respectively. Arterial blood gas analysis will be performed before insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum and repeated at each level of PEEP. A minimum of 4 minutes equilibration time will be provided after changing PEEP.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 23
- Elective laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg (head-down) position
- smoker
- lung disease (e.g. asthma, COPD, emphysema)
- BMI > 30 kg/m2
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Decremental PEEP Blood gas analysis Every participant will be exposed to a stepwise decremental PEEP. Decremental PEEP Registration of respiratory mechanics Every participant will be exposed to a stepwise decremental PEEP. Decremental PEEP Decremental PEEP Every participant will be exposed to a stepwise decremental PEEP. Decremental PEEP Lung ultrasound score Every participant will be exposed to a stepwise decremental PEEP. Decremental PEEP Evaluation of dead space Every participant will be exposed to a stepwise decremental PEEP.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lung ultrasound score Perioperatively Lung ultrasound score per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O). The score is dimensionless. A cumulative count is calculated for each level of PEEP by adding the scores from the 6 scanned lung regions together.
The lung ultrasound score is a measure of atelectasis.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Dead space Perioperatively Median dead space per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O).
Transpulmonary pressure (cmH2O) Perioperatively Transpulmonary pressure per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O). Transpulmonary pressure is calculated as plateau airway pressure minus esophageal pressure (at the same timepoint).
Plateau airway pressures (cmH2O) are measured at the ventilator during an inspiratory pause.
Esophageal pressures (cmH2O) are measured with an esophageal balloon and pressure transducer.
Esophageal pressures are proven to correlate closely to pleural pressures. The Fluxmed device (MBMED, Argentina) is used to capture pressures and volumes at the ventilator.Driving pressure (cmH2O) Perioperatively Driving pressures per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O). Driving pressure (cmH2O) is calculated as plateau airway pressure minus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).
Plateau airway pressures (cmH2O) are measured at the ventilator during an inspiratory pause.
PEEP (cmH2O) is measured at the ventilator at end-expiration. The Fluxmed device (MBMED, Argentina) is used to capture pressures and volumes at the ventilator.P/F ratio (Horowitz index, mmHg / %) Perioperatively Ratio of the arterial oxygen tension (mmHg) divided by the fraction of inspired oxygen (%) per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O).
The arterial oxygen tension is measured at a point-of-care blood gas analyzer (Roche Cobas, Basel, Swiss) The inspiratory oxygen fraction (%) is measured at the ventilator.Dynamic pulmonary compliance (ml/cmH2O) Perioperatively Dynamic pulmonary compliance per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O). The dynamic pulmonary compliance is calculated as tidal volume divided by the driving pressure.
Tidal volumes (ml) are measured at the ventilator. Driving pressures are calculated as mentioned in the description of outcome 3. The Fluxmed device (MBMED, Argentina) is used to capture pressures and volumes at the ventilator.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Antwerp University Hospital
🇧🇪Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium