MedPath

A comparison of two modalities to visualise the microcirculation: Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography and capillary videomicroscopy

Recruiting
Conditions
disturbed vasodilation
Microvascular dysfunction
10018424
10057166
Registration Number
NL-OMON33075
Lead Sponsor
Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria

1. Caucasian*
2. age 18-55 years
3. 20 < BMI > 35
* because capillaries are not visible in the nailfold in a pigmented skin

Exclusion Criteria

1. cardiovascular disease (stroke, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure)
2. pulmonary disease
3. diabetes mellitus (FPG > 7.8 mmol/l)
4. liver dysfunction (ASAT, ALAT and/or alkaline phosphatase >3 times the upper limit of normal)
5. renal failure
6. smoking
7. alcohol use > 4 U/day
8. use of medication (antihypertensive drugs, lipid lowering drugs, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, ciclosporin A, rifampicin)
9. pregnancy
10. insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language.
11. known previous allergic reaction to ultrasound contrast-agent (e.g. Sonovue)

Study & Design

Study Type
Observational invasive
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
<p>1. percentage change in muscle microvascular blood volume as measured by CEUS.<br /><br>2. percentage change in number of capillaries as measured by nailfold<br /><br>capillaroscopy.</p><br>
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
<p>1. muscle microvascular flow velocity (percentage change)<br /><br>2. muscle microvascular blood flow (percentage change)<br /><br>3. time to peak flow<br /><br>4. muscle microvascular flow distribution<br /><br>5. whole body glucose uptake<br /><br>6. total forearm blood flow (percentage change)<br /><br>7. blood pressure</p><br>
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath