A comparison of two modalities to visualise the microcirculation: Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography and capillary videomicroscopy
- Conditions
- disturbed vasodilationMicrovascular dysfunction1001842410057166
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON33075
- Lead Sponsor
- Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 20
1. Caucasian*
2. age 18-55 years
3. 20 < BMI > 35
* because capillaries are not visible in the nailfold in a pigmented skin
1. cardiovascular disease (stroke, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure)
2. pulmonary disease
3. diabetes mellitus (FPG > 7.8 mmol/l)
4. liver dysfunction (ASAT, ALAT and/or alkaline phosphatase >3 times the upper limit of normal)
5. renal failure
6. smoking
7. alcohol use > 4 U/day
8. use of medication (antihypertensive drugs, lipid lowering drugs, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, ciclosporin A, rifampicin)
9. pregnancy
10. insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language.
11. known previous allergic reaction to ultrasound contrast-agent (e.g. Sonovue)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>1. percentage change in muscle microvascular blood volume as measured by CEUS.<br /><br>2. percentage change in number of capillaries as measured by nailfold<br /><br>capillaroscopy.</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>1. muscle microvascular flow velocity (percentage change)<br /><br>2. muscle microvascular blood flow (percentage change)<br /><br>3. time to peak flow<br /><br>4. muscle microvascular flow distribution<br /><br>5. whole body glucose uptake<br /><br>6. total forearm blood flow (percentage change)<br /><br>7. blood pressure</p><br>