Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07336810
NCT07336810
Enrolling By Invitation
Not Applicable

Effect of Whole-Body Vibration Versus Neuro Muscular Electrical Stimulation on Patients With Intensive Care Acquired Weakness

Cairo University1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: January 10, 2026Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Enrolling By Invitation
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Medical Research Council (MRC)

Overview

Brief Summary

Purpose: to investigate the effect of Whole-body vibration versus neuro-muscular electrical stimulation on patients with intensive care-acquired weakness. Methods: Sixty patients with Intensive Care Unit-acquired weakness (ICU AW) from both genders will be recruited and randomly assigned into two groups, Group A and Group B. Group A will include 30 patients who will practice Whole body vibration for two weeks twice daily in addition to their plan of treatment. Group B will include 30 patients who will receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation for two weeks, twice daily, in addition to their plan of treatment. All patients will be evaluated pre- and post-treatment for the MRC score, creatine phosphokinase, and total muscle strength and skeletal muscle thickness

Detailed Description

A) Procedure for evaluation:

The practical section of the study will be undertaken in 2 weeks (two sessions per day). Measurements will be taken before the start of the training program then after the end of the 2-week training program in the following manner:

  1. Manual muscle test (MMT) and medical research council score (MRC): will be used to assess muscle strength.
  2. Laboratory investigations for CPK: Blood serum samples will be collected. For each sample, 5 mL of blood will be drawn for laboratory analyses to detect damage in skeletal muscle.
  3. Strength Testing with Dynamometry: A Handheld Dynamometer will be used to assess the skeletal muscle strength objectively.
  4. Skeletal muscle ultrasonography: will be used to assess the size and thickness of muscles.

B) Training procedures:

All patients in both groups will receive their plan of treatment in addition to the training program for each group as follows:

Group (A) patients in this group will participate in Whole Body Vibration (WBV) training for 2 weeks, two sessions per day (total 14 sessions) in addition to their plan of treatment.

Group (B) patients in this group will participate in neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) training for 2 weeks, two sessions per day ( total 14 sessions), in addition to their plan of treatment.

C) The statistical analysis will be conducted by using the SPSS statistical package program version 25 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Quantitative descriptive statistics data, including the mean and standard deviation, will be used to describe the data. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) will be used to compare the tested major dependent variables of interest. A mixed-design 2 x 2 MANOVA test will be used to detect within-group changes and between-group differences. The Bonferroni correction test will be used for pairwise comparison within and between groups of the tested dependent variables, whose P-value will be significant from the MANOVA test. The significance level for all statistical analyses will be set at p<0.05.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • ICU patients who were aged ≥ 18 and \<
  • Sepsis-related Organ Failure assessments (SOFA) score ≥ 9 within the first 72 h after ICU admission.
  • Patients with no central and peripheral nervous system injury.
  • Expected to be treated in the ICU for more than 1 week.
  • Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score of less than 36/
  • Dominant-hand handgrip dynamometry scores of less than 11 kg (interquartile range (IQR) 10-40) in males and less than 7 kg (IQR 0-7.3) in females

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with comorbidities interfering with or compromising the training, like cardiac arrhythmia, pericardial effusion, congestive heart failure, or unstable acute coronary syndrome.
  • Patients are hemodynamically unstable.
  • Patients who had a major neurological deficit (upper motor neuron lesion).
  • Age \< 18 years and more than
  • Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Unhealed fractures or recently attached implants in the body region to be stimulated.
  • Acute venous thrombosis.

Arms & Interventions

Group A ( Whole body vibration)

Active Comparator

each patient who will practice Whole body vibration for two weeks twice daily in addition to their plan of treatment.

Intervention: whole body VIBRATION Viberation (Device)

Group B (NEURO MUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION B )

Active Comparator

Each patient will receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation for two weeks, twice daily, in addition to their plan of treatment

Intervention: Neuro muscular electrical stimulation (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Medical Research Council (MRC)

Time Frame: At baseline and post two weeks

The MRC scale will be used for early detection of muscle strength, as it has a score ranging from 0 to 60, where \< 48 means significant weakness

Manual muscle test (MMT)

Time Frame: At baseline and post two weeks

manual muscle testing will be assessed bilaterally, including tibialis anterior, triceps surau, Quadriceps, hamstrings, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and wrist extensors. these muscles will be assessed in 5 grades of muscle testing, where grade zero means no contraction and grade five means active movement through the full range of motion against full applied resistance against gravity

change of Creatine phosphokinase (CPK-MM)

Time Frame: change from baseline CPK-MM level at 2 weeks

The Beckman Unicel DxC800 method will be used for measuring serum CPK-MM

muscle strength

Time Frame: At baseline and post two weeks

Handheld dynamometry (HHD) will be used to measure the muscle strength of the selected muscles by quantifying the force generated when a person pushes or pulls against a stationary device.

Muscle thickness

Time Frame: at baseline and post 2 weeks

Skeletal muscle ultrasonography will be used to assess muscle thickness

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

AHMED REFAAT ABD EL AZIZ TAHA MALIK

Principle investigator

Cairo University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials