Feasibility of the use of Ultrasound Doppler-derived patient-specific velocity profiles in fluid-structure interaction modelling of the abdominal aorta, femoral artery and carotid artery
- Conditions
- 'Aneurysm''Dilated artery''Narrowed artery''Stenosis'10002363
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON53799
- Lead Sponsor
- Catharina-ziekenhuis
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 48
The main inclusion criterium for the patients is that they have an abdominal
aortic aneurysm or a femoral artery or carotid artery stenosis. Furthermore,
the patients should be under surveillance at the Catharina hospital for their
stenosis or aneurysm. For the AAA patients, an additional inclusion criterium
is that they are involved in the longitudinal study (research mentioned in B2).
The volunteers should be in the age of 18-65 and not diagnosed with a
cardiovascular disease.
Minors, incapacitated adults and mentally incompetent adults will not be
included in the study. Subjects that do not want to participate will also not
be included. Furthermore, also patients and volunteers that suffer from
claustrophobia will be excluded from the study. Lastly, the patients and
volunteers will be screened for metallic foreign bodies. In case that metallic
foreign bodies are present the patients and volunteers will not be included in
the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational non invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Patient specific velocity profile over time and cross section of the abdominal<br /><br>aorta, carotid artery and femoral artery obtained with Ultrasound Doppler and<br /><br>compared with 4D flow MRI (abdominal aorta) or 2D PCMRI (femoral and carotid<br /><br>artery). This patient specific velocity profile will be used in FSI simulations<br /><br>of AAA's, carotid artery stenoses and femoral artery stenoses.</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The secondary goal of this study is to validate the FSI model. With 4D flow<br />MRI, the velocity streamlines can be constructed, which can then be compared to<br />the streamlines from the FSI model. In addition, based on the velocity measured<br />with 4D flow MRI, the Wall Shear Stress (WSS) and Oscillatory Shear Index (OSI)<br />can be calculated, which can also be compared to the WSS and OSI as predicted<br />by the FSI model. Also the with MRI measured wall displacements will be<br />compared to the with FSI simulated wall displacements. Lastly, the 4D flow MRI<br />data will also be used for the validation of the stiffness of the aortic wall.</p>