Comparing the Reliability of a Web-based Intraoperative Adverse Event Assessment Tool With Standard Cognitive Grading. The Intraoperative Complication Assessment and Reporting With Universal Standards - Calculator (ICARUS-C)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 2,000
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Evaluate the consistency and inter-rater reliability of the 5 iAEs grading systems in terms of Percent agreement of grade
研究概览
简要总结
As part of the initiative known as the Intraoperative Complication Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) project, the investigators are working to develop a set of tools to aid in improving the homogenous reporting of intraoperative adverse events (iAEs). Accordingly, the investigators developed a web-based tool, known as the ICARUS Calculator, that integrates the 5 published iAE grading systems. We plan to compare the consistency of grading responses between the ICARUS Calculator and the individual grading systems as presented in their respective publications.
The purpose of this study is two-fold. First, the investigators hope to evaluate the utility of a web-based intraoperative adverse event (iAE) grading system known as the Intraoperative Complication Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) calculator. Second, the investigators plan to evaluate the difference in iAE grading outcomes of the ICARUS calculator compared with standard iAE grading.
详细描述
Perioperative complications, especially intraoperative adverse events (iAEs), carry significant potential for long-term sequelae in a patient's postoperative course. Without consistent and homogenous reporting, these events represent a substantial gap in contemporary surgical literature and clinical practice. By definition, an iAE is any unplanned incident related to a surgical intervention occurring between skin incision and skin closure. Despite the availability of multiple intraoperative grading and classification systems, colloquiallary known as: EAUiaiC, iAE severity classification scheme, Modified Satava, EAES Grading system, and ClassIntra® (formerly CLASSIC) , the reporting of intraoperative adverse events remains exceedingly rare. Further, while most studies report postoperative adverse events, only a fraction of surgical publications report intraoperative complications as outcomes of interest.
As part of the initiative known as the Intraoperative Complication Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) project, the investigators are working to develop a set of tools to aid in improving the homogenous reporting of iAEs. Accordingly, the investigators developed a web-based tool, known as the ICARUS Calculator, that integrates the four aforementioned iAE grading systems. The investigators plan to compare the consistency of grading responses between the ICARUS Calculator and the individual grading systems as presented in their respective publications.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Documented understanding, willingness, and agreement to participate in this study
- •Males and females; age 18 or older
- •Must be either English speaking or fluent with English medical terminology
- •Currently or formerly practicing surgeon or proceduralist, regardless of the domain
排除标准
- •Activity restrictions that limit one's ability to engage in online survey
- •Adults not competent to consent
- •Minors, human fetuses, neonates Prisoners/Detainees
结局指标
主要结局
Evaluate the consistency and inter-rater reliability of the 5 iAEs grading systems in terms of Percent agreement of grade
时间窗: 03-01-2022 to 03-15-2022
Primary data analysis will involve calculations to evaluate the consistency and inter-rater agreement for each grading system, as follows: -Percent agreement of grade
Evaluate the consistency and inter-rater reliability of the 5 iAEs grading systems using the Intra-class correlation (ICC) with two-way, random effects to evaluate for consistency of grades
时间窗: 03-01-2022 to 03-15-2022
Primary data analysis will involve calculations to evaluate the consistency and inter-rater agreement for each grading system, as follows: -Intra-class correlation (ICC) with two-way, random effects to evaluate for consistency of grades
Evaluate theTime to complete grading (minutes) using the 5 iAEs grading systems
时间窗: 03-01-2022 to 03-15-2022
Primary data analysis will involve calculations i to evaluate the consistency and inter-rater agreement for each grading system, as follows: -Time to complete grading (minutes)
Evaluate Time to complete grading (minutes)using the ICARUS Calculator
时间窗: 03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022
Primary data analysis will involve calculations to evaluate the consistency and inter-rater agreement for each grading system, as follows: -Time to complete grading (minutes)
Evaluate the consistency and inter-rater reliability of the ICARUS Calculator in term of Distribution of responses by count and percent
时间窗: 03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022
Primary data analysis will involve calculations to evaluate the consistency and inter-rater agreement for each grading system, as follows: -Distribution of responses by count and percent
Evaluate the consistency and inter-rater reliability of the 5 iAEs grading systems in terms of Distribution of responses by count and percent
时间窗: 03-01-2022 to 03-15-2022
Primary data analysis will involve calculations to evaluate the consistency and inter-rater agreement for each grading system, as follows: -Distribution of responses by count and percent
Evaluate the consistency and inter-rater reliability of the ICARUS Calculator using Cohen's Kappa
时间窗: 03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022
Primary data analysis will involve calculations to evaluate the consistency and inter-rater agreement for each grading system, as follows: - Cohen's Kappa
Evaluate the consistency and inter-rater reliability of the 5 iAEs grading systems using the Cohen's Kappa
时间窗: 03-01-2022 to 03-15-2022
Primary data analysis will involve calculations to evaluate the consistency and inter-rater agreement for each grading system, as follows: - Cohen's Kappa
Evaluate the consistency and inter-rater reliability of the ICARUS Calculator in terms of Percent agreement of grade
时间窗: 03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022
Primary data analysis will involve calculations to evaluate the consistency and inter-rater agreement for each grading system, as follows: -Percent agreement of grade
Determination of benefit in efficiency of the ICARUS Calculator compared to cognitively grading intraoperative adverse events
时间窗: 03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022
Determination of benefit in efficiency, consistency, inter-rater reliability of the ICARUS Calculator compared to cognitively grading intraoperative adverse events There will be 5 output groupings involving the grading systems: 1. ICARUS calculator vs. EAUiaiC 2. ICARUS calculator vs. iAE severity 3. ICARUS calculator vs. Modified Satava 4. ICARUS calculator vs. ClassIntra 5. ICARUS calculator vs. EAES Classification
Determination of benefit in consistency of the ICARUS Calculator compared to cognitively grading intraoperative adverse events
时间窗: 03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022
Determination of benefit in efficiency, consistency, inter-rater reliability of the ICARUS Calculator compared to cognitively grading intraoperative adverse events There will be 5 output groupings involving the grading systems: 1. ICARUS calculator vs. EAUiaiC 2. ICARUS calculator vs. iAE severity 3. ICARUS calculator vs. Modified Satava 4. ICARUS calculator vs. ClassIntra 5. ICARUS calculator vs. EAES Classification
Evaluate the consistency and inter-rater reliability of the ICARUS Calculator using Intra-class correlation (ICC) with two-way, random effects to evaluate for consistency of grades
时间窗: 03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022
Primary data analysis will involve calculations to evaluate the consistency and inter-rater agreement for each grading system, as follows: -Intra-class correlation (ICC) with two-way, random effects to evaluate for consistency of grades
Determination of benefit in efficiency, consistency, inter-rater reliability of the ICARUS Calculator compared to cognitively grading intraoperative adverse events
时间窗: 03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022
Determination of benefit in efficiency, consistency, inter-rater reliability of the ICARUS Calculator compared to cognitively grading intraoperative adverse events There will be 5 output groupings involving the grading systems: 1. ICARUS calculator vs. EAUiaiC 2. ICARUS calculator vs. iAE severity 3. ICARUS calculator vs. Modified Satava 4. ICARUS calculator vs. ClassIntra 5. ICARUS calculator vs. EAES Classification
Determination of benefit in inter-rater reliability of the ICARUS Calculator compared to cognitively grading intraoperative adverse events
时间窗: 03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022
Determination of benefit in efficiency, consistency, inter-rater reliability of the ICARUS Calculator compared to cognitively grading intraoperative adverse events There will be 5 output groupings involving the grading systems: 1. ICARUS calculator vs. EAUiaiC 2. ICARUS calculator vs. iAE severity 3. ICARUS calculator vs. Modified Satava 4. ICARUS calculator vs. ClassIntra 5. ICARUS calculator vs. EAES Classification
次要结局
- Evaluation of the experience using the ICARUS calculator by using the Usefulness, Satisfaction and Ease of Use (USE) questionnaire.(03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022)
- Evaluation of the experience using the ICARUS calculator by using Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS)(03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022)
- Evaluation of the experience using the ICARUS calculator by System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire(03-16-2022- to 06-01-2022)
研究者
Giovanni Cacciamani
Assistant Professor of Research Urology
University of Southern California
