EZIO Compared to Central Venous Lines for Emergency Vascular Access
- Conditions
- Catheters, IndwellingCentral Venous LineIntraosseous Needle
- Interventions
- Device: standard central lineDevice: Powered Intraosseous device (EZIO)
- Registration Number
- NCT00785252
- Brief Summary
Multicenter randomized study to compare powered intraosseous access to standard central line access for the administration of fluids and drugs for patients in the Emergency Dept.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Over 18 years old Requires central access after peripheral access attempts have failed or are not otherwise feasible
Fracture in target bone Not able to sign informed consent Excessive tissue or absence of adequate anatomical landmarks Known or suspected coagulopathies Pregnancy Patients in custody Patients with suspected great vessel injury Not fluid in English
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2 standard central line Central line 1 Powered Intraosseous device (EZIO) EZIO
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time taken to place the device ED visit
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of complications ED visit Costs for each of the two methods Ed visit
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Dept of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center
🇺🇸Washington, District of Columbia, United States