MedPath

Comparison of the efficacy of excimer lamp v/s smashed skin grafting with excimer lamp in the treatment of vitiligo.

Not Applicable
Conditions
Health Condition 1: L80- Vitiligo
Registration Number
CTRI/2021/07/034526
Lead Sponsor
S Nijalingappa Medical College and H S K Hospital
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

1.Patient willing to give informed consent.

2.Patients with stable vitiligo. Stable vitiligo is de�ned as a patient reporting the absence of new lesions, absence of the progression of existing lesions and absence of Koebner phenomenon in the previous year.

3.Patients with age >15 years and <60years.

4.Patients refractory to topical and systemic treatment.

5.Patients not on any treatment 3 months prior to start of study.

Exclusion Criteria

1.Patient with vitiligo involving >20% body surface area involvement.

2.Patients with bleeding and clotting disorders.

3.Pregnant females.

4.Patients with systemic disorders.

5.Patients having tendency for keloid formation.

6.Patients with reactive serology (HIV, HBsAG and VDRL).

7.Patients with history of photodermatosis or history of skin cancer.

8.Patients not willing for the procedure and not willing for regular follow up.

9.Patients with unrealistic expectations.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1.To study and compare the efficacy of 308nm excimer lamp and smashed skin grafting with 308nm excimer lamp in the treatment of vitiligo. <br/ ><br>2.To compare the procedures for the faster re-pigmentation of the vitiligo patches. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cost effectivenessTimepoint: 6 months
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath