Safety and Efficacy Study of Zilucoplan in Subjects With Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy
- Conditions
- Immune Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy
- Interventions
- Other: Placebo
- Registration Number
- NCT04025632
- Lead Sponsor
- Ra Pharmaceuticals
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of zilucoplan in patients with Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy (IMNM). Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive daily SC doses of 0.3 mg/kg zilucoplan or matching placebo for 8 weeks.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 27
- Clinical diagnosis of IMNM (Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy)
- Positive serology for anti-3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) or anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) autoantibodies
- Clinical evidence of weakness (≤ grade 4 out of 5) on manual muscle testing in at least one proximal limb muscle group
- Creatine kinase (CK) of >1000 U/L at Screening
- No change in corticosteroid dose for at least 30 days prior to Baseline or anticipated to occur during the first 8-weeks on study
- No changes in immunosuppressive therapy, including dose, for at least 30 days prior to Baseline or anticipated to occur during the first 8-weeks on study
- History of meningococcal disease
- Current or recent systemic infection within 2 weeks prior to Screening or infection requiring intravenous (IV) antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to Screening
- Recent initiation of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (i.e., first cycle administered less than 90 days prior to Baseline)
- Rituximab use within 90 days prior to Baseline or anticipated to occur during study
- Statin use within 30 days prior to Baseline or anticipated to occur during study
- Plasma exchange within 4 weeks prior to Baseline or expected to occur during the 8-week Treatment Period
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo Placebo Daily subcutaneous (SC) injection 0.3 mg/kg zilucoplan zilucoplan Daily subcutaneous (SC) injection
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Serum Creatine Kinase (CK) Levels Baseline (Day 1) and end of Main Portion (Week 8) All laboratory samples were obtained prior to administration of study drug at applicable visits. CK levels were measured by a central laboratory.
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Baseline (Day 1) to end of Main Portion (Week 8) A TEAE was defined as:
* An adverse event (AE) that occurred after study treatment start that was not present at the time of treatment start.
* An AE that increased in severity after treatment start if the event was present at the time of treatment start.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Score Baseline (Day 1) and end of Main Portion (Week 8) The FACIT-Fatigue Scale is a 13-item tool which measured an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. The level of fatigue was measured on a 4-point Likert scale. The total FACIT-Fatigue Scale score for this study could range from 0-52, where 0 means the participants were very much fatigued during their usual daily activities and 52 means the participants were not at all fatigued during their usual daily activities. A negative change from Baseline indicated a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Proximal Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score Baseline (Day 1) and end of Main Portion (Week 8) The proximal MMT assessed muscle strength using manual muscle testing in 7 muscle groups (left and right sides assessed separately). The total MMT score for this study, inclusive of both sides, could range from 0-140, where 0 means no strength in any muscles and 140 means full strength in all the muscles examined. A negative change from Baseline indicated a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Triple Timed Up and Go Test (3TUG) Time Baseline (Day 1) and end of Main Portion (Week 8) The 3TUG test involved the ambulatory participant getting up from a seated position in a chair, walking at their normal pace for 3 meters, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down. This sequence was repeated 3 times without rest, and the 3TUG test time is the average of the 3 lap times. A negative change from baseline indicated a better outcome.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Physician Global Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score Baseline (Day 1) and end of Main Portion (Week 8) The Physician Global Activity VAS Score measured the treating physician's global evaluation of the participant's overall disease activity using a 10 cm VAS labelled with "no activity" at the left end and "maximum activity" at the right end. The Physician Global Activity VAS Score ranged from 0 (absent extramuscular disease activity) to 10 (maximum extramuscular disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated a better outcome.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Patient Global Activity VAS Score Baseline (Day 1) and end of Main Portion (Week 8) The Patient Global Activity VAS Score measured the treating participant's global evaluation of their overall disease activity using a 10 cm VAS labelled with "no activity" at the left end and "maximum activity" at the right end. The Patient Global Activity VAS score ranged from 0 (absent extramuscular disease activity) to 10 (maximum extramuscular disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated a better outcome.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in HAQ Score Baseline (Day 1) and end of Main Portion (Week 8) The HAQ had 8 sections: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities with 2 to 3 questions for each section. Scoring within each section ranged from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The total HAQ score was then calculated by summing the scores and dividing by the number of categories answered. The total HAQ score for this study could range from 0-3, where 0 means no functional impairment and 3 means complete functional impairment. A negative change from Baseline indicated a better outcome.
Number of Participants Who Achieve at Least Minimal Response Based on the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Response Criteria Scale Baseline (Day 1) and end of Main Portion (Week 8) The ACR/EULAR scale utilized a conjoint analysis-based continuous model using absolute percent change from Baseline in core set measures (physician, patient, and Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT); muscle strength; Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ); and muscle enzyme levels). A total improvement score (range 0-100) was determined by summing scores for each core set measure and comparing improvement in each respective core set measure. The threshold for minimal improvement was ≥20 in the total improvement score with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in MDAAT Extramuscular Disease Activity VAS Score Baseline (Day 1) and end of Main Portion (Week 8) The MDAAT extramuscular disease activity VAS score measured the degree of disease activity of extramuscular organ systems and muscle. The scoring was performed by the physician and ranged from 0 (absent extramuscular disease activity) to 10 (maximum extramuscular disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated a better outcome.
Trial Locations
- Locations (18)
University of California Los Angeles
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
The Ohio State University
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
University of California Irvine
🇺🇸Orange, California, United States
University of Florida Health Jacksonville
🇺🇸Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis
🇺🇸Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
Northwell Health Neuroscience Institute
🇺🇸Great Neck, New York, United States
Wesley Neurology Clinic
🇺🇸Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Amsterdam UMC
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Netherlands
Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière
🇫🇷Paris, France
Salford Royal NHS Barnes Clinical Research Facility
🇬🇧Manchester, United Kingdom
University of Pennsylvania
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
University of South Florida
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
National Institute of Health
🇺🇸Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Austin Neuromuscular Center
🇺🇸Austin, Texas, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
🇺🇸Kansas City, Kansas, United States