The Effect of Secondary Prevention Education Given to Individuals After Acute Myocardial Infarction on Physiological Parameters, Anxiety and Quality of Life
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction, Acute
- Sponsor
- Abant Izzet Baysal University
- Enrollment
- 86
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- means of subjective anxiety scores
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to examine the effect of secondary prevention education given to individuals after acute myocardial infarction on physiological parameters, anxiety and quality of life.
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to examine the effect of secondary prevention education given to individuals after acute myocardial infarction on physiological parameters, anxiety and quality of life.The population of the study will be the individuals hospitalized with the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the Coronary Intensive Care Unit of Abant Izzet Baysal University Izzet Baysal Training and Research Hospital. The study will be conducted in a randomized controlled manner with two groups, 43 in the control group and 43 in the secondary prevention education group. CAG (Coronary Angiography) Procedure Training Form, Patient Identification Form, Physiological Parameters Form and Visual Analogue Scale, Spielberg State and Trait Anxiety Scale and Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale will be used to collect data. The data will be collected by face to face interview technique. For descriptive statistics, mean and standard deviation or median and minimum-maximum values for numerical variables, number and percentage values for categorical variables will be given. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p \<0.05), skewness and kurtosis coefficients (should be ± 1) and X ̅ / SS \<4 inequalities will be examined at the same time, and the weight in which group will be preferred.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •First time AMI and inpatient treatment in the coronary intensive care unit,
- •Not having received training after AMI \*
- •Being 18 years or older,
- •Speak Turkish,
- •No problem in verbal communication,
- •Absence of hearing loss,
- •Not being diagnosed with a psychiatric illness,
- •Being conscious,
- •Being volunteer to participate in the study,
- •Routine check of cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglyceride results at the beginning of the study and at 6 months.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Not having had AMI for the first time
- •Having received training after AMI
- •Not willing to participate in the study,
- •Cannot speak Turkish,
- •Problems in verbal communication,
- •Having hearing loss,
- •Having a diagnosis of psychiatric illness,
- •Unconsciousness.
- •Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglyceride results were not routinely checked at the start and 6 months of the study.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
means of subjective anxiety scores
Time Frame: six months
Spielberg State- Trait Anxiety Scale. The total score between 0-19 obtained from the state anxiety scale shows that there is no anxiety, the total score between 20-39 indicates mild, the average score between 40-59 indicates moderate, and the total score between 60-79 indicates severe anxiety, and over 60 points are needed for professional help. The scores obtained from the trait anxiety scale vary between 20 and 80. A high score means a high and a low level means anxiety
means of subjective quality of life scores
Time Frame: six months
It consists of 35 items and the quality of life is based on physical activity (12 items), insecurity (9 items), emotional response (4 items), addiction (3 items), diet (3 items), concerns about medication (2 items), Each sub-dimension of MIDAS, which measures seven domains as (2 items), is scored between 0-100. High scores indicate poor health.
Secondary Outcomes
- means of subjective pain score(six months)