Comparison of two radiation delivery techniques - VMAT and 3D CRT in the irradiation of the Central Nervous System
Phase 1
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Patients receiving Craniospinal Irradiation
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2017/08/009431
- Lead Sponsor
- JIPMER
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 15
Inclusion Criteria
All paediatric patients receiving Craniospinal Irradiation.
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method It is a cross sectional study comparing two plans.Timepoint: Once recruitment is complete. Since it is a dosimetric analysis, patient information other than CT scan are not necessary.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method o secondary outcomeTimepoint: Nil
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the dosimetric advantages of VMAT over 3D CRT in craniospinal irradiation for CNS tumors?
How does VMAT compare to 3D CRT in reducing spinal cord toxicity during CNS radiation therapy?
What biomarkers correlate with radiation-induced neurocognitive outcomes in pediatric CNS irradiation trials?
Are there molecular mechanisms linking VMAT dose distribution to improved tumor control in CNS malignancies?
What adverse events are associated with VMAT versus 3D CRT in craniospinal irradiation protocols?