Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04323774
NCT04323774
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable

AYA-RISE: Refining a Scalable, Patient- and Family-centered Intervention to Improve Cancer Risk Communication and Decision-making Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer Risk Syndromes

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute5 sites in 1 country115 target enrollmentMarch 1, 2021

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cancer Risk Syndrome
Sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Enrollment
115
Locations
5
Primary Endpoint
Utilization of AYA-RISE
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
4 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This research is being done because there is a need to improve cancer risk communication and decision-making among adolescents and young adults. In this study, the investigators are looking at whether using a chatbot and online portal for cancer risk information helps improve communication and decision-making.

  • Over 70,000 adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are diagnosed with cancer in the U.S. every year and up to 10% have genetic changes (or, mutations) that put them at a higher risk of developing new cancers during their lifetimes. These genetic mutations can result in cancer risk syndromes (such as, Lynch Syndrome or Li-Fraumeni Syndrome). Identifying cancer risk syndromes can allow for screening and early diagnosis of future cancers, which could ultimately save lives and offer more care choices for patients. As a result, genetic counseling and testing for cancer risk syndromes is being recommended more for Adolescents and Young Adults with new cancer diagnoses, regardless of family history.
  • This research study to develop an intervention called AYA-RISE that aims to assist AYAs with cancer risk communication and decision-making around their caregivers.

Detailed Description

This research study involves three aims (Aims 1, 2, and 3). * Aim 1, Part 1, which focuses on finding the best format for the study intervention (called AYA-RISE); whether AYA-RISE is easy to use; and whether patients, family caregivers, and providers find AYA-RISE acceptable.The research study procedures include: * Using and reviewing AYA-RISE, * Participating in audio-recorded, 30-minute interviews * Aim 1, Part 2, which is a pilot study of the study intervention (called AYA-RISE). In this pilot study, the investigators are looking at whether AYA-RISE is easy to use and what participants think of it. \-- The activities involved in this part of the study are: * Baseline Questionnaire * Using and reviewing AYA-RISE * Follow-up Questionnaire * Brief feedback interviews on AYA-RISE * In Aim 2, participants will be randomized trial into one of two groups; * Group 1: Standard Genetic Counseling/follow-up visit or * Group 2 : Standard Genetic Counseling/follow-up visit and Access to AYA-Rise * Aim 3: Semi-Structured Interviews: * Evaluate implementation outcomes using 28 semi-structured interviews with patients, family members, providers, and site principal investigators

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 1, 2021
End Date
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
4 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Jennifer Mack, MD

Principal Investigator

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Across all study aims, we will enroll AYA patients, family members/caregivers, and providers.
  • AIM 1, PART 1 - STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
  • AYA Patients
  • Ages 12-24 years, inclusive
  • Diagnosed with a cancer risk syndrome
  • English-speaking and -reading
  • Receiving care at any of the study sites OR participating in the LiFraumeni Syndrome Association (LFSA) Youth Conference
  • Adequate cognitive function per NeuroQOL indicated by a score of 30 or greater
  • Not receiving active cancer therapy
  • Family caregivers-Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Utilization of AYA-RISE

Time Frame: 2 Years

Chat transcripts and patient portal access

Participants who followed up for recommended care

Time Frame: screening and follow-up over the next year up to 24 Months

We will identify recommended care and screening via medical record review, and whether care was received, post-visit.

Percentage of Consenting AYA use AYA-RISE

Time Frame: 2 years

The feasibility (\>70% consenting AYAs use AYA-RISE through the risk communication step of the chat and patient portal, based on use data from Clear Genetics)

Percentage of Acceptability

Time Frame: 2 years

Acceptability (\>70% AYAs consider the intervention acceptable, measured as a post-test AIM score \>4.)

Change in patient knowledge of cancer risk and screening

Time Frame: baseline to post-visit surveys up to 24 months

This change will be measured by baseline and post-visit survey responses on the Knowledge of Cancer Screening and Gist Comprehension of Genetic Cancer Risk measures.

Change in psychological distress

Time Frame: baseline to post-visit surveys up to 24 months

This change will be measured by baseline and post-visit survey responses using the psychosocial aspects of hereditary cancer (PAHC) measure.

Patient ownership of information in the intervention arm

Time Frame: 24 Months

determined as % AYAs able to store and access portal information

Acceptability of AYA-RISE

Time Frame: 2 Years

Semi-structured interview: How did patients, providers, family members feel about the intervention? Was the experience positive, negative, or neutral? An analytic matrix on intervention design will be used to code of semi-structured interviews

Adoption of AYA-RISE

Time Frame: 2 Years

An analytic matrix on intervention design will be used to code of semi-structured interviews \- Semi-structured interview of Providers and Clinic Leaders * Were patients and providers willing to try the intervention? * Would they want to continue to use the intervention?

Practicality of Using AYA-RISE

Time Frame: 2 Years

An analytic matrix on intervention design will be used to code of semi-structured interviews: Site PI Semi-structured interview * Is it practical to continue to use AYA-RISE within constraints of * clinic, provider, and patient/family needs?

Fidelity of AYA-RISE

Time Frame: 2 Years

* Site RA: Observation and Checklist * Does actual implementation match the planned process?

Sustainability of AYA-Rise

Time Frame: 2 Years

An analytic matrix on intervention design will be used to code of semi-structured interviews Can the processes required for AYA-RISE be maintained beyond the research setting?

Study Sites (5)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials