MedPath

Olorinab in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Predominant Constipation (IBS-C) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Predominant Diarrhea (IBS-D)

Phase 2
Terminated
Conditions
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Interventions
Drug: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT04043455
Lead Sponsor
Arena Pharmaceuticals
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether olorinab is a safe and effective treatment for abdominal pain in participants with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
273
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with predominant constipation (IBS-C) or predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) according to Rome IV criteria at Visit 1 (Screening)

  • Per the Rome IV diagnostic algorithm for IBS, participants 50 years of age and over are to have had one of the following with a result that rules out causes of abdominal pain other than IBS:

    1. Colonoscopy (within 10 years of Visit 1 [Screening])
    2. Flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema (within 5 years of Visit 1 [Screening])
    3. Computed tomography colonography (within 5 years of Visit 1 [Screening])

Main Study

Exclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of IBS with mixed bowel habits (IBS-M) or unsubtyped IBS (IBS-U)
  • Clinically relevant changes in dietary, lifestyle, or exercise regimen within 30 days prior to Visit 1 (Screening) that may confound efficacy assessments in the clinical judgment of the Investigator (or designee)
  • Any colonic or major abdominal surgery (eg, bariatric surgery [including gastric banding], stomach surgery, small/large bowel surgery, or abdominal large vessel surgery). History of cholecystectomy is exclusionary for participants with IBS-D. For participants with IBS-C, a history of cholecystectomy more than 6 months prior to Visit 1 (Screening) is allowed. Procedures such as appendectomy, hysterectomy, caesarean section, or polypectomy are allowed as long as they have occurred at least 3 months prior to Visit 1 (Screening).

Long-Term Extension Inclusion Criteria:

•All participants must have completed the Main Study (including both Visit 8 [Week 12] and Visit 9 [Week 14])

Long-Term Extension Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant meets any exclusion criteria from the Main Study at the time of assessing eligibility for the LTE, unless approved by the Sponsor in advance.
  • Participant had less than 75% overall compliance with eDiary entries during the Main Study.
  • Participant deviated from the prescribed dosage regimen during the Main Study (ie, overall study treatment compliance less than 85% or more than 115%), unless approved by the Sponsor in advance.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Olorinab (Long-Term Extension)OlorinabParticipants will receive olorinab based on their treatment assignment in the Main Study.
Olorinab medium dose (Main Study)Olorinab-
Olorinab high dose (Main Study)Olorinab-
Placebo (Main Study)Placebo-
Olorinab low dose (Main Study)Olorinab-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Main Study: Change From Baseline in Average Abdominal Pain Score (AAPS) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12

The APS is a single question, 11-point numeric rating scale in which 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents the worst possible abdominal pain. The change in AAPS from Baseline at Week 12 was analyzed using a mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, stratification factors, week, and treatment-by-week interaction as factors and Baseline AAPS as a covariate. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used for the MMRM analysis.

Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 14 Weeks

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were defined as any AE that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study treatment.

LTE Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEsUp to 54 Weeks

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were defined as any AE that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study treatment.

Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ParametersBaseline to Week 14

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of laboratory parameters including serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant abnormalities.

LTE Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ParametersBaseline to Week 54 (of LTE)

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of laboratory parameters including serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant abnormalities.

Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital SignsBaseline to Week 14

Parameters assessed for vital signs included blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure), heart rate (HR), body temperature, and respiratory rate. The investigator was responsible for reviewing vital signs for clinically significant abnormalities.

LTE Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital SignsBaseline to Week 54 (of LTE)

Parameters assessed for vital signs included blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure), HR, body temperature, and respiratory rate. The investigator was responsible for reviewing vital signs for clinically significant abnormalities.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30% Improvement in AAPS at Week 12Baseline and Week 12

The percentage of participants achieving a \>= 30% improvement in AAPS from Baseline at Week 12 was analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test stratified by the stratification factors. Missing post-baseline AAPS data was imputed using multiple imputation (MI) under the missing at random (MAR) assumption. Participants who were randomized but did not have at least 1 post-Baseline observation were considered non-responders. A \>= 30% improvement in AAPS was a reduction in AAPS of 30% or more when compared to Baseline AAPS.

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 30% Improvement in AAPS From Baseline for at Least 6 of the 12 WeeksBaseline and Week 12

The percentage of participants achieving a \>= 30% improvement in AAPS from Baseline for at least 6 of the 12 weeks during the Treatment Period were analyzed using a CMH test stratified by the stratification factors. A \>= 30% improvement in AAPS is a reduction in AAPS of 30% or more when compared to Baseline AAPS. Missing post-baseline AAPS data was imputed using MI under the MAR assumption.

Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in AAPS at Week 12Baseline and Week 12

The percent change in AAPS from Baseline at Week 12 was analyzed using an MMRM analysis with treatment, stratification factors, week, and treatment-by-week interaction as factors and Baseline AAPS as a covariate. Baseline is the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment at Day 1.

Main Study: Change From Baseline in Number of Pain-Free Days at Week 12Baseline and Week 12

The change from Baseline at Week 12 in number of pain-free days per week was analyzed using a MMRM analysis with treatment, stratification factors, week, and treatment-by-week interaction as factors and Baseline pain free days as a covariate. Pain-free days were defined as days with a pain score of zero (0). Baseline is the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment at Day 1.

Main Study: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of OlorinabOn Day 1: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post dose and Week 4: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1 and 2 hours post dose

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated timepoints after the administration of study treatment to investigate Cmax of Olorinab. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Main Study: Time of Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) of OlorinabOn Day 1: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post dose and Week 4: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1 and 2 hours post dose

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated timepoints after the administration of study treatment to investigate Tmax of Olorinab. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Main Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabPre dose on Day 1, Day 2 and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 10 and 12

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time frames after the administration of study treatment to investigate Ctrough of Olorinab. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Trial Locations

Locations (69)

WR-ClinSearch, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Rapid Medical Research, Inc.

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

New River Valley Research Institute

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Christiansburg, Virginia, United States

WestGlenGI

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States

Digestive Disease Specialists, Inc.

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Gilbert Center for Family Medicine

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Prime Care Clinical Research

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Kindred Medical Institute for Clinical Trials, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Corona, California, United States

Clinical Research of Brandon, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Brandon, Florida, United States

Gastroenterology Associates of Gainesville Georgia

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Gainesville, Georgia, United States

Lynn Institute of Denver

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Agile Clinical Research Trials LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Alliance Research Institute

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Canoga Park, California, United States

Clinical Research Atlanta

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Stockbridge, Georgia, United States

Flint Clinical Research, PLLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Flint, Michigan, United States

MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Frederick Gastroenterology Associates

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Frederick, Maryland, United States

Clinical Research of Gastonia

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Gastonia, North Carolina, United States

Clinical Trials of SWLA, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Peters Medical Research, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Claude Mandel Medical Center

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Louisiana Research Center, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Medication Management, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Great Lakes Gastroenterology Research, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Mentor, Ohio, United States

Biopharma Informatic, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Houston, Texas, United States

Oregon Center for Clinical Investigations, Inc. (OCCI, Inc.)

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Salem, Oregon, United States

Lynn Institute of Tulsa

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Clinical Trial Network

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Houston, Texas, United States

Susquehanna Research Group, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Exemplar Research Inc

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

MultiCare Institute for Research & Innovation

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Tacoma, Washington, United States

ACR Gut Whisperer

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Lynn Health Science Institute

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Long Island Gastrointestinal Research Group LLP

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Great Neck, New York, United States

Om Research, Attn: Heather Blunt

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Lancaster, California, United States

San Diego Gastroenterology Medical Associates (CTNx)

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

San Diego, California, United States

M3 Wake Research

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

GW Research, Inc.

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Chula Vista, California, United States

Clinical Research Associates, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

East Valley Gastroenterology and Hepatology Associates

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Diagnamics Inc.

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Encinitas, California, United States

TriWest Research Associates, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

El Cajon, California, United States

Precision Research Institute

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

San Diego, California, United States

Advanced Rx Clinical Research Group, Inc.

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Westminster, California, United States

Medical Associates Research Group

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

San Diego, California, United States

Precision Clinical Research, LLC.

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Sunrise, Florida, United States

Qps Mra, Llc

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

South Miami, Florida, United States

Atlanta Center for Medical Research

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Columbus Regional Research Institute

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Advanced Clinical Research, Attn to: Owen Havey

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Lemah Creek Clinical Research

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, United States

CroNOLA, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Houma, Louisiana, United States

Hassman Research Institute

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Meridian Clinical Research, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, United States

Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Research Studies at Fine Digestive Health

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Irving, Texas, United States

Central Sooner Research

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

WR-Mount Vernon Clinical Research, LLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States

Chattanooga Research & Medicine, PLLC

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Accel Research Sites - Birmingham Clinical Research Unit

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Presicion Research Center Inc

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Tampa, Florida, United States

Center for Pharmaceutical Research, LLC an AMR company

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Clinical Trials of South Carolina

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Care Access Research, Pottsville

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Pottsville, Pennsylvania, United States

Clinical Research of Rock Hill

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Rock Hill, South Carolina, United States

Great Lakes Medical Research

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Coastal Carolina Research Center

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Family Practice Center of Wadsworth, Inc. dba New Venture Medical Research

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Wadsworth, Ohio, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath