MedPath

Prevalence-based Health and Economic Model of the Bivalent Versus the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine

Completed
Conditions
Human Papillomavirus Infection
Interventions
Other: Prevalence-based model
Registration Number
NCT01702337
Lead Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Brief Summary

This study compares the health and economic impact of the bivalent HPV vaccine (HPV-1) and the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV-2).

Detailed Description

This study uses a prevalence-based model (by using efficacy data from each vaccine's respective trials and published cost data for Taiwan) which estimates the differences in lesions, genital warts, cervical cancer and costs from a healthcare payer's perspective prevented between HPV-1 and HPV-2 vaccines during one year (when all women are vaccinated). It also analyses costs from a societal perspective.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
1
Inclusion Criteria
  • Female subjects vaccinated with either HPV-1 or HPV-2 vaccines in Taiwan (hypothetical group).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Not applicable.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
HPV-2 GroupPrevalence-based modelHypothetical group of women vaccinated with HPV-2 vaccine in Taiwan.
HPV-1 GroupPrevalence-based modelHypothetical group of women vaccinated with HPV-1 vaccine in Taiwan.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Annual number of lesions prevented by each vaccineOver a one-year period
Lesion related total cost averted by each vaccineOver a one-year period
Additional costs averted by HPV-1 vaccine compared to HPV-2 vaccineOver a one-year period
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath