Evaluation Of Safety And Efficacy Of 0.3 Mg/Eye Macugen In Patients With Small Age-Related Macular Degeneration Lesions
- Registration Number
- NCT00324116
- Lead Sponsor
- Pfizer
- Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy, based on the best-corrected visual acuity (using the ETDRS chart), of a 0.3 mg/eye pegaptanib sodium intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration and evidence of recent onset, subfoveal and/or juxtafoveal choroidal neovascularization.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 81
- Clinical and angiographic evidence of juxtafoveal or subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD with a total lesion size of less than 2 MPS disc areas
- Best-corrected visual acuity in the study eye greater than 54 letters (ETDRS)
- Women must be using 2 forms of effective contraception
- Adequate hematological, renal and liver functions
- Any atrophy or fibrosis; any retinal hemorrhage measuring more than 1 disc area
- Any extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization
- Any intraocular surgery or thermal laser to the study eye within 3 months of enrollment
- Previous or concomitant therapy for AMD including PDT with verteporfin (Visudyne) or subfoveal/non-foveal thermal laser therapy, transpupillary thermotherapy, external beam radiation, submacular surgery.
- Presence of other causes of choroidal neovascularization, including pathological myopia, the ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, choroidal rupture and multifocal choroiditis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Active pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Baseline, 54 Weeks Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Responders defined as subjects having lost from baseline less than 15 letters of the best-corrected visual acuity; includes subjects with visual acuity gain.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 54 weeks Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Change: mean score at observation minus mean score at baseline.
Number of Subjects Gaining Vision 54 weeks or at early termination Subjects gaining vision: gain from baseline of more than 15 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.
Number of Subjects Maintaining Vision 54 weeks or at early termination Subjects maintaining vision: gain from baseline of more than 0 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.
Number of Subjects With Severe Visual Loss 54 weeks or at early termination Subjects with severe visual loss: loss from baseline of \>= 30 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.
Number of Subjects With a Distance Visual Acuity of > 20/200 at Baseline and Progressing to (<= 20/200) 54 weeks Subjects with improving scores are those with \> 20/200 at Baseline and progressing to =\< 20/200 at Week 54.
Subjects with no change are those with \> 20/200 at Baseline and remaining at \> 20/200 at Week 54.Change in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25). Baseline, 54 weeks or at early termination Patient reported vision-related functioning and quality of life as measured using the 25 item NEI-VFQ 25. Change = Mean score at 54 weeks - mean score at baseline. A positive change represents an increase in function/health from Baseline. Items grouped as the following - Composite: mean score items 1-25; General Health: item 1; General Vision: item 2; Ocular Pain:4,19; Near Vision:5,6,7; Distance Vision:8,9,14; Social Functioning:11,13; Mental Health Activities:3,21,22,25; Role Difficulties:17,18; Dependency:20,23,24; Driving:15c,16, 16a; Color Vision: 12; Peripheral Vision: 10.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pfizer Investigational Site
🇫🇷Toulouse, France