跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06092541
NCT06092541已完成不适用

Comparison of Efficacy Between Nitrous Oxide (n2o) Analgesia and Pericervical Analgesia in Outpatient Operative Hysteroscopy With Miniresector: a Randomized Clinical Pilot Study

Ospedale degli Infermi di Biella1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2023年10月2日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
Rate of pain, measured through the Visual Analog Scale 1 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain) using Pericervical Analgesia versus Analgesia with Nitrous Oxide in outpatient hysteroscopic surgery with Miniresector

研究概览

简要总结

This research will have the aim of evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of two methods (analgesia with nitrous oxide and pericervical analgesia, excluding the use of paracervical block due to the increased risk of complications reported in the literature in the control of pain caused during Outpatient Operative Hysteroscopy maneuvers with Miniresector.

详细描述

Pain is the primary cause of hysteroscopy failure. It can be attributed to multiple causes, such as manipulation of the cervical canal , uterine distention due to the liquid distension media used during the procedure , operating procedures on the endometrium (as a possible cause of uterine contraction) , until the release of prostaglandins following manipulation of the cervix and uterine distension.

There are few studies in the literature that have compared the various methods of pain control during the hysteroscopic examination. Among these, Ahmad et al., for example, compared the use of the paracervical block and inhalation anesthesia during hysteroscopy: although both proved to be effective in controlling pain, the paracervical block was associated with a greater number of complications. More recently, Solano et al. they defined how the administration of nitrous oxide was equally effective (but with many more advantages) to the paracervical block with 1% lidocaine in controlling pain during hysteroscopy performed using the Bettocchi hysteroscope.

However, for the purposes of this research it is important to take two aspects into consideration:

  • all the studies in the literature that compared the various pain control methods during hysteroscopy were conducted using the Bettocchi Hysteroscope and not the Miniresector;
  • more in detail, there are no studies comparing the use of nitrous oxide and pericervical analgesia during outpatient operative hysteroscopy with miniresector.

Objective This clinical trial will have the aim of evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of two methods (analgesia with nitrous oxide and pericervical analgesia, excluding the use of paracervical block due to the increased risk of complications reported in the literature1) in the control of pain caused during Outpatient Operative Hysteroscopy maneuvers with Miniresector.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

The patients, in the database, will be identified as group A and B; Once the study and the compilation of the database have been completed, this will be delivered to the results evaluation team which will therefore be blinded, not being able to recognize whether group A and B belong to control or intervention.

入排标准

年龄范围
25 Years 至 50 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • nulliparous or primiparous women (a previous Spontaneous Vaginal Birth -PS- or a previous Cesarean Section -TC- the latter comparable to nulliparous women as no previous cervical dilation -)
  • age between 25 and 50 years

排除标准

  • age < 25 or > 50 years
  • multiparity
  • positive history of previous operations on the cervical canal (e.g. conization)

研究组 & 干预措施

Control group: nitrous oxide anesthesia

Active Comparator

Control group: nitrous oxide anesthesia

干预措施: Nitroux Oxide anesthesia (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of pain, measured through the Visual Analog Scale 1 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain) using Pericervical Analgesia versus Analgesia with Nitrous Oxide in outpatient hysteroscopic surgery with Miniresector

时间窗: 6 months

Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale -VAS- using Pericervical Analgesia versus Analgesia with Nitrous Oxide in outpatient hysteroscopic surgery with Miniresector

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Ospedale degli Infermi di Biella
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Bianca Masturzo

Head of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Ospedale degli Infermi di Biella

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

已完成
4 期
Comparing efficiency of inhaled Nitrous oxide with intramuscular Pethidine for pain relief during active phase of labor; A Randomized Controlled Triallabour pain
TCTR20210315002Vajira Hospital, Navamindrahiraj University112
Unknown
4 期
Nitrous Oxide Prior to Intranasal Midazolam for Moderate Dental Sedation in Pediatric PatientsDental AnxietyPain
NCT04083105Children's Hospital Colorado150
进行中(未招募)
不适用
Comparison of 30% nitrous oxide with therapeutic dose nimodipine on cerebral and systemic vascular physiology - Nitrous Oxide compared with nimodipineThis is part of a series of studies investigating the potential therapeutic use of low dose nitrous oxide in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm, a condition which occurs following brain injury and stroke. The aim is to compare the effects of 30% nitrous oxide with therapeutic dose of nimodipine (the current treatment for cerebral vasospasm) on cerebral vascular physiology and systemic vascular effects.
EUCTR2010-022874-15-GBniversity of Nottingham20
已完成
不适用
Comparing inhaled nitrous oxide gas with cognitive behavioral therapy to reduce anxiety in children undergoing dental treatment
ISRCTN89346151niversidad Austral de Chile49
进行中(未招募)
1 期
Comparison of Supplemental Oxygen and Nitric Oxide for Inhalation Plus Oxygen in the Evaluation of the Reactivity of the Pulmonary Vasculature During Acute Pulmonary Vasodilator Testing - N/Aitric Oxide for inhalation at 800ppm, plus 100% O2, to be used to assess pulmonary vaso reactivity during Pulmonary Vasodilator Testing
EUCTR2004-000625-30-GBINO Therapeutics150