Rotational Atherectomy Prior to Taxus Stent
- Conditions
- Complex Calcified Coronary Lesions
- Interventions
- Procedure: Rotational Atherectomy + PESProcedure: Standard Treatment (PES without Rotational Atherectomy)
- Registration Number
- NCT00380809
- Lead Sponsor
- Segeberger Kliniken GmbH
- Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of the polymer-based slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS; Boston Scientific), with or without prior rotablation, in an angiographically well defined group of patients with complex calcified coronary lesions.
- Detailed Description
Calcification is an essential part of all atherosclerotic plaques. Its extent increases with the progression of atherosclerotic disease. Heavily calcified lesions form a particular threat to DES; both damage to the polymer coating during vigorous advancement and inadequate diffusion of the drug to the subintima through extensive calcium arcs could contribute to the ineffectiveness of DES when implanted into such lesions, or may lead to primary stent delivery or expansion failure. Rotational atherectomy can effectively ablate calcified plaques. In the DES era, data concerning rotational atherectomy are scarce. DES implantation following rotablation seems a rational combination, but is only poorly supported by controlled studies. In the present study, we are using the polymer-based slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS; Boston Scientific), with or without prior rotablation, in an angiographically well defined group of patients with complex calcified coronary lesions. This prospective, randomized, controlled study aims at evaluating the long term effects of both strategies in this complex cohort of patients.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 240
- Angiographically proven coronary artery disease
- Angina II-IV° following the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification criteria and/or reproducible ischemia in the target area by ECG or scintigraphy
- The patient signing an informed written consent
From the following angiographic criteria, lesions must fulfil all first degree criteria and at least one second-degree criterion to be eligible for inclusion.
First degree criteria
- De-novo lesion in a native coronary artery
- Target reference vessel diameter between 2.5 and 4.0 mm by visual estimation
- Luminal diameter reduction of 70-99% by visual estimation
- Moderate to severe calcification of the target lesion (clearly defined)
Second degree criteria
- Ostial location
- Bifurcational lesions
- Long lesions (≥ 15mm)
- Myocardial infarction within 4 weeks
- Left ventricular ejection fraction < 30%
- Limited long term prognosis due to other conditions
Angiographic exclusion criteria:
- Unprotected left main lesions
- Coronary artery bypass graft stenoses
- In-stent restenoses
- Chronic total occlusions
- Target vessel thrombus
- Target vessel dissection
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Rotational Atherectomy + PES Rotational Atherectomy + PES Elective lesion preparation with rotational atherectomy priot to stent implantation Standard Treatment (PES without Rotational Atherectomy) Standard Treatment (PES without Rotational Atherectomy) Stenting without prior rotational atherectomy, usually preceeded with balloon dilatation
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method In-stent late lumen loss 9 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) 9 months In-segment late lumen loss 9 months In-segment binary restenosis 9 months Primary angiographic success Immediate Procedural duration and contrast dye amount Immediate Strategy success Immediate
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Herz-Kreislauf-Zentrum Segeberger Kliniken GmbH
🇩🇪Bad Segeberg, Germany