Comparison of the new PRP loop with Opus loop for closing extraction space
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K002- Abnormalities of size and form ofteeth
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/07/070006
- Lead Sponsor
- Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Age- 15 to 30 years patients with Angle’s Class I Dewey’s type 2 malocclusion.
Patients having average growth pattern requiring maxillary premolar extractions.
Moderate to critical anchorage cases.
Those with healthy periodontal status, without periodontal pocket depths more than 2 to 3 mm and the ones who require fixed orthodontic treatment.
Those with Angle’s Class II and III malocclusion.
Patients having inborn and developmental syndromes.
Systemic disorders like clotting diseases or conditions such as pregnancy.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method PRP loop may be an effective tool for anterior en-masse retraction and may lead to minimum anchorage loss. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1st assessment- 2months <br/ ><br>2nd assessment- after extraction space closure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ILTimepoint: NI