Intragastric Balloon, Air Versus Fluid Filled: Randomized Prospective Study
- Conditions
- ToleranceMorbid ObesityWeight Loss
- Interventions
- Device: Air filled balloonDevice: Bioenteric BIB® balloon
- Registration Number
- NCT02129296
- Lead Sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Brief Summary
Gastric balloons are an evolving way of reducing weight. There are two types on the market, up to date. Air filled balloons seem to be more safe, and more tolerable.
- Detailed Description
Morbidly obese patients are categorized into two groups: the 1st group to whom intragastric air filled balloon and the 2nd group to whom saline filled balloon is applied for treatment of their morbid obesity. The aim of study is to compare both types of balloons regarding safety, efficacy and tolerance.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 300
- Morbidly obese patients
- Patient refused
- Non compliant patients
- Psychological patients
- Oesophageal varices, big hiatus hernia, ulcers
- Gastric vascular malformations
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description hemiosphere® BALLOON Air filled balloon Balloon filled with air according to the manufacturing company orders 600 or 720 ml air Fluid filled balloon Bioenteric BIB® balloon Balloon filled with saline and methylene blue according to the manufacturing company orders
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Tolerance 6 months Tolerance of the patients toward the balloon regarding vomiting, nausea, dysphagia , gastric pain and dyspepsia
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of deflation or puncture 6 MONTHS Rate of deflation or puncture (in air filled, it well be followed up by x ray every 2 weeks while in saline filled, it well be followed up by observation of blue coloured urine
Weight loss 6 months Weight loss by Kg and BMI,
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hafr Albatin Central hospital
🇪🇬Mansoura University, Egypt