MedPath

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Plus Exercise for Older People With Chronic Low-back Pain: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)
Registration Number
NCT07211464
Lead Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Brief Summary

Low back pain (LBP) is the fifth-most common disorder among older adults 60 years or older. The prevalence of LBP increases with age, with the highest prevalence occurring at 85 years old. Because many older individuals face various age-related life challenges (e.g., comorbidities, financial difficulties, and bereavement), the addition of chronic LBP (CLBP) to existing stressors may worsen their physical and psychological well-being. Unfortunately, CLBP is difficult to manage and is refractory to many existing treatments. Physiotherapy treatments alone show only modest improvements in LBP or LBP-related disability. Recent research has shown that proper pain self-management is crucial to reduce pain and disability in individuals with CLBP.

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a new mindfulness-based therapy, has been suggested for chronic pain management. ACT improves an individual's psychological flexibility, by improving their openness, awareness, and acceptance of the present moment (including pain). Combining ACT and exercise classes has the potential to improve the latter treatment's efficacy. Our recent pragmatic pilot, 2-arm cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) on 40 older adults with CLBP revealed that eight weeks of ACT plus exercise and an 8-week back care education plus exercise program (control group) were safe, feasible, and well accepted by participants in elderly community centres. Moreover, compared to the control group, the ACT-plus-exercise group showed significantly greater improvements in pain intensity, LBP-related disability, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and psychological flexibility immediately after treatment. These promising preliminary findings indicate that a fully powered clinical trial is warranted.

Detailed Description

Building on our pilot study, we aim to conduct a pragmatic definitive cluster RCT in multiple elderly community centres to validate our findings immediately post-treatment and to explore its potential beneficial effects 3 and 6 months after treatment. Additionally, we will conduct a mediation analysis to explore potential mediation effects of psychological flexibility on the association between post-treatment changes in LBP-related disability and the corresponding changes in HRQOL in older adults with CLBP. Collectively, the project's results have the potential to help clinicians find a novel pragmatic approach to empower community-dwelling older adults to self-manage their CLBP.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • aged 60 or above
  • have had non-specific LBP in or near the lumbosacral spine, with or without leg pain, that lasts for at least 3 months in the last 12 months
  • Average pain intensity (in the past week) ≥ 4 on a scale of 0 to 10
  • must have sought some healthcare professional treatments for CLBP in the last 12 months
  • have an adequate level of proficiency in Chinese
  • Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) scores: 23 or above
Exclusion Criteria
  • People with malignant pain or lumbar spinal stenosis, confirmed dementia, severe cognitive impairment, or serious psychiatric or psychological disorders that may hinder their study participation will be excluded
  • Individuals with Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) scores below 23

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Pain intensityBaseline, immediately after treatment, at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups

Current, worst, least, and average LBP intensities in the last 24 hours will be assessed in four days within a week before each assessment using separate 11-point NPRS. The NPRS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable". The average LBP intensity over the four days will be calculated as a composite score for data analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Pain-related disabilityBaseline, immediately after treatment, and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups

The Chinese version of the 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire will be used to evaluate LBP-related disability in older adults.\[21\] It consists of 24 yes/no items concerning LBP-related functional limitations. The number of items with "yes" answers indicates the severity of the respondent's LBP-related disability. The maximum score is 24.

Change in Psychological flexibilityBaseline, immediately after treatment, and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups

Participants' psychological flexibility will be measured by The 7-item Chinese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II). It comprises 7 statements, which respondents rate on a 7-point scale, where 1 means "never true" and 7 means "always true". The maximum total score is 49. Higher total scores indicate less flexibility. The AAQ-II has been cross-culturally adapted and validated among Chinese adolescents and has demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

Change in HRQOLBaseline, immediately after treatment, and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups

Participants' HRQOL will be measured by the Chinese version of the EQ-5D-5L. It comprises 5 items related to mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each item has 5 response options ("no problem", "slight problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems", and "extreme problems/unable to"). It has been found to be useful in monitoring treatments' effects on HRQOL.

Change in Psychological factorsBaseline, immediately after treatment, and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups

The Hong Kong Chinese version of the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales will be used to evaluate depression (7 items), anxiety (7 items), and stress (7 items) in older adults. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("most of the time"). Higher scores imply more severe mental health issues. This questionnaire and its subscales have demonstrated excellent internal consistency for assessing depression, anxiety, and stress.

Change in falling riskBaseline, immediately after treatment, and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups

The Timed Up and Go test will be used to assess transfer skills and walking. It can identify community-dwelling older adults at risk of falling.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

🇭🇰

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
🇭🇰Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Dr Arnold Wong Yu Lok
Contact
(852) 2766 6741
arnold.wong@polyu.edu.hk
Dr Arnold Yu Lok Wong
Principal Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.