MedPath

A Study of Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy With Guselkumab and Golimumab in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Colitis, Ulcerative
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03662542
Lead Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combination therapy with guselkumab and golimumab in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
214
Inclusion Criteria
  • Confirmed clinical diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) at least 3 months before screening
  • Moderately to severely active UC as defined by Mayo score
  • History of inadequate response to or failure to tolerate conventional therapy
  • Has screening laboratory test results within the study protocol defined parameters
  • A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum (beta human chorionic gonadotropin) pregnancy test result at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test result at Week 0
Exclusion Criteria
  • Has severe extensive colitis as defined in the study protocol
  • Has UC limited to the rectum only or to less than (<) 20 centimeter (cm) of the colon
  • Has a history of latent or active granulomatous infection, including histoplasmosis or coccidioidomycosis, before screening
  • Has any known malignancy or has a history of malignancy (with the exception of basal cell carcinoma; squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the skin; or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence; or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence within 5 years before screening)
  • Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to guselkumab or golimumab or their excipients

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Combination TherapyGolimumab Dose 1Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as intravenous (IV) infusion and Dose 2 as subcutaneous (SC) injection; and golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Combination TherapyGolimumab Dose 2Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as intravenous (IV) infusion and Dose 2 as subcutaneous (SC) injection; and golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Monotherapy: GuselkumabGuselkumab Dose 1Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as IV infusion, Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Monotherapy: GolimumabPlaceboParticipants will receive golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Monotherapy: GolimumabGolimumab Dose 2Participants will receive golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Combination TherapyGuselkumab Dose 1Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as intravenous (IV) infusion and Dose 2 as subcutaneous (SC) injection; and golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Combination TherapyGuselkumab Dose 2Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as intravenous (IV) infusion and Dose 2 as subcutaneous (SC) injection; and golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Combination TherapyPlaceboParticipants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as intravenous (IV) infusion and Dose 2 as subcutaneous (SC) injection; and golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Monotherapy: GuselkumabGuselkumab Dose 2Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as IV infusion, Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Monotherapy: GuselkumabPlaceboParticipants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as IV infusion, Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Monotherapy: GolimumabGolimumab Dose 1Participants will receive golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Combination Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 12Week 12

Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline in the Mayo score greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 percent (%) and \>=3 points with either a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) \>=1 or a RBS of 0 or 1. The Mayo score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment, and endoscopy findings - each with score range of 0 (normal activity) to 3 (severe activity) and a total score range of 0 to 12 points. A score of 3 to 5 points indicates mildly active disease, a score of 6 to 10 points indicates moderately active disease, and a score of 11 to 12 points indicates severely active disease. Higher scores indicate more severity. This outcome measure was analyzed for combination phase only as preplanned in the protocol.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Combination Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 12Week 12

Clinical remission was defined as the Mayo score less than or equal to (\<=) 2 with no individual subscore greater than (\>) 1. The Mayo score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment, and endoscopy findings) each with score range of 0 (normal activity) to 3 (severe activity) and a total score range of 0 to 12 points. A score of 3 to 5 points indicates mildly active disease, a score of 6 to 10 points indicates moderately active disease, and a score of 11 to 12 points indicates severely active disease. Higher scores indicate more severity. This outcome measure was analyzed for combination phase only as preplanned in the protocol.

Trial Locations

Locations (82)

Precision Research Institute

🇺🇸

San Diego, California, United States

Peak Gastroenterology Associates

🇺🇸

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

GCP Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

Gastrointestinal Specialists of Georgia

🇺🇸

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Indiana University

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Chevy Chase Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Woodholme Gastroenterology

🇺🇸

Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States

Sierra Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

🇺🇸

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Fargo Gastroenterology Clinic, PC

🇺🇸

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Scroll for more (72 remaining)
Precision Research Institute
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath