A Study of Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy With Guselkumab and Golimumab in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
- Conditions
- Colitis, Ulcerative
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03662542
- Lead Sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combination therapy with guselkumab and golimumab in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 214
- Confirmed clinical diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) at least 3 months before screening
- Moderately to severely active UC as defined by Mayo score
- History of inadequate response to or failure to tolerate conventional therapy
- Has screening laboratory test results within the study protocol defined parameters
- A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum (beta human chorionic gonadotropin) pregnancy test result at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test result at Week 0
- Has severe extensive colitis as defined in the study protocol
- Has UC limited to the rectum only or to less than (<) 20 centimeter (cm) of the colon
- Has a history of latent or active granulomatous infection, including histoplasmosis or coccidioidomycosis, before screening
- Has any known malignancy or has a history of malignancy (with the exception of basal cell carcinoma; squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the skin; or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence; or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence within 5 years before screening)
- Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to guselkumab or golimumab or their excipients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Combination Therapy Golimumab Dose 1 Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as intravenous (IV) infusion and Dose 2 as subcutaneous (SC) injection; and golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind. Combination Therapy Golimumab Dose 2 Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as intravenous (IV) infusion and Dose 2 as subcutaneous (SC) injection; and golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind. Monotherapy: Guselkumab Guselkumab Dose 1 Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as IV infusion, Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind. Monotherapy: Golimumab Placebo Participants will receive golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind. Monotherapy: Golimumab Golimumab Dose 2 Participants will receive golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind. Combination Therapy Guselkumab Dose 1 Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as intravenous (IV) infusion and Dose 2 as subcutaneous (SC) injection; and golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind. Combination Therapy Guselkumab Dose 2 Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as intravenous (IV) infusion and Dose 2 as subcutaneous (SC) injection; and golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind. Combination Therapy Placebo Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as intravenous (IV) infusion and Dose 2 as subcutaneous (SC) injection; and golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind. Monotherapy: Guselkumab Guselkumab Dose 2 Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as IV infusion, Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind. Monotherapy: Guselkumab Placebo Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 as IV infusion, Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind. Monotherapy: Golimumab Golimumab Dose 1 Participants will receive golimumab Dose 1 and Dose 2 as SC injection and placebo to maintain the blind.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Combination Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 12 Week 12 Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline in the Mayo score greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 percent (%) and \>=3 points with either a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) \>=1 or a RBS of 0 or 1. The Mayo score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment, and endoscopy findings - each with score range of 0 (normal activity) to 3 (severe activity) and a total score range of 0 to 12 points. A score of 3 to 5 points indicates mildly active disease, a score of 6 to 10 points indicates moderately active disease, and a score of 11 to 12 points indicates severely active disease. Higher scores indicate more severity. This outcome measure was analyzed for combination phase only as preplanned in the protocol.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Combination Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 12 Week 12 Clinical remission was defined as the Mayo score less than or equal to (\<=) 2 with no individual subscore greater than (\>) 1. The Mayo score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment, and endoscopy findings) each with score range of 0 (normal activity) to 3 (severe activity) and a total score range of 0 to 12 points. A score of 3 to 5 points indicates mildly active disease, a score of 6 to 10 points indicates moderately active disease, and a score of 11 to 12 points indicates severely active disease. Higher scores indicate more severity. This outcome measure was analyzed for combination phase only as preplanned in the protocol.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (82)
Precision Research Institute
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Peak Gastroenterology Associates
🇺🇸Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
GCP Clinical Research
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
Gastrointestinal Specialists of Georgia
🇺🇸Marietta, Georgia, United States
Indiana University
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Chevy Chase Clinical Research
🇺🇸Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States
Woodholme Gastroenterology
🇺🇸Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States
Sierra Clinical Research
🇺🇸Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
🇺🇸Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Fargo Gastroenterology Clinic, PC
🇺🇸Fargo, North Dakota, United States
Scroll for more (72 remaining)Precision Research Institute🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States