CTRI/2020/02/023529尚未招募未知
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure VS Conventional respiratory support in neonates more than 34 weeks of gestation with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome .
VMMC and SJH0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •Neonates with gestation more than 34 weeks , admitted in NICU whoa are born through meconium stained amniotic fluid
排除标准
- 未提供
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
Comparing two respiratory support methods in RDS treatment of premature neonatesneonatal respiratory distress syndrome.IRCT20200616047788N1Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences120
尚未招募
Unknown
A RESEARCH STUDY TO ASSESS FEASIBILITY OF ADMINISTERING TWO DIFFERENT VENTILATOR MODES FOR LIBERATION FROM VENTILATOR IN HIGH RISK CHILDRECTRI/2023/11/059777POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
已完成
不适用
Comparison of using two kinds of devices in respiration of hospitalized childreCondition 1: Acute respiratory failure. Condition 2: Chronic respiratory failure. Condition 3: Respiratory failure.Chronic respiratory failureRespiratory failure, unspecifiedAcute respiratory failureIRCT2013043013189N1Vice chancellor for research, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences50
已完成
不适用
A comparison of the use of different types of continous positive airway pressure (CPAP) masks to control leaks and improve patient comfortObstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA)Respiratory - Sleep apnoeaACTRN12609000029291Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health40
招募中
不适用
Comparing the usage of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) against the RACer airway device in the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) in naive PAP users.Obstructive Sleep ApnoeaACTRN12617001090303Auckland University of Technology (AUT) Enterprises Ltd30