Comparison of Ultrasound guided Infraclavicular Axillary Vein versus Internal Jugular Vein cannulation in adult critically ill patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare ultrasound guided infraclavicular axillary vein versus internal jugular vein
研究概览
简要总结
This is a randomised comparative interventional studycomparing the efficacy of ultrasound guided infraclavicular axillary veinversus internal jugular vein cannulation in 60 adult critically ill patients usingtotal procedural time as primary outcome. The two approaches will be comparedin terms of total procedural time, access time, guidewire time, skin to vein depth,number of attempts and complication rate of each approach. A post procedure Xray will be done to rule out complications associated with the procedure.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Permuted block randomization, variable
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Adult critically ill patients admitted in ICU requiring central venous cannulation.
排除标准
- •1.Body Mass Index >30kg/m2 .
- •2.Contraindications to the Central Venous Catheterization insertion (coagulopathies, on anticoagulants, thrombosis, local site infection).
- •3.Raised Intracranial Pressure.
- •4.Patients with arrhythmia or underlying lung disease.
- •5.Vertical depth of Axillary Vein >4cm from skin.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare ultrasound guided infraclavicular axillary vein versus internal jugular vein
时间窗: Total time required from placement of the USG probe to the completion of final dressing.
cannulation in adult critically ill patients using total procedural time
时间窗: Total time required from placement of the USG probe to the completion of final dressing.
次要结局
- 1. Access time(2. Guidewire time)