Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices (TAD) Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Deep Overbite
• Interventions: Device: Intrusion

• Registration Number: NCT06430710
• Lead Sponsor: Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls

Brief Summary

Compare the tooth borne versus fixed orthodontic intrusive system (TADs) for the correction of anterior deep overbite

Detailed Description

this study determined which method was more compliant, efficacy and comfortable. It was performed to evaluate intrusion of upper incisors with applying tooth borne system as Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and temporary anchorage devices (TADs) \[miniscrew\] and evaluate the dental and skeletal cephalometric effects of these intrusion methods on individuals with deep bite caused by supraocclusion of upper incisors. It also evaluated oral hygiene and pain sensation in the two groups during the study period.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2022-09-25
• Primary Completion: 2024-02-02
• Study Completion: 2024-03-27
• Status Verified: 2024-05
• Study First Submitted: 2024-05-10
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-05-24
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-05-24
• Study First Posted: 2024-05-28
• Last Update Posted: 2024-05-28

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 16

Inclusion Criteria

1. Class I or Class II malocclusion with minimal crowding.
2. 70% to 100% overbite.
3. High lip line with gingival display on smiling and super-eruption of maxillary incisors.
4. All patients had permanent dentition with average to vertical growth pattern and curve of Spee of 4mm or less.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Having missing teeth on the anterior maxillary area.
2. Any history of trauma or root canal treatment.
3. Previous orthodontic treatment.
4. Low lip line duing social smile.
5. Having any hormonal disorder or syndromes.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Mninscrew	Intrusion	Miniscrews for incisor intrusion
Intrusive arch	Intrusion	Continuous arch technique for incisor intrusion

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Measure distance of insicors intrusion	2 years	measure in mm the distance of apical movement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Pain intensity	8 months	By unit on Visual Analogue Scale

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Al-Azhar University; 🇪🇬 Cairo, Egypt