Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05654558
NCT05654558CompletedNot Applicable

Deep Bite Correction Using Auxiliary Intrusion Cantilevers With Initial Archwires in Adolescents

Alexandria University1 site in 1 country27 target enrollmentStarted: September 12, 2020Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
27
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
True incisor intrusion

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of auxiliary intrusion cantilevers used with resilient archwires during the leveling and alignment phase in intruding lower incisors.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
12 Years to 17 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Permanent dentition present except for third molars
  • •No history of previous orthodontic treatment.
  • •Class I or II malocclusion with minimal or no lower anterior crowding (<3 mm)
  • •Excessive overbite (>3 mm).

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Syndromic patients as well as individuals with skeletal asymmetry
  • •Endodontically treated or periodontally involved loweranterior teeth.
  • •Need for tooth extraction in the lower arch.
  • •Agenesis (except for third molars)
  • •Any kind of tooth/root shape anomaly

Arms & Interventions

Auxiliary intrusion cantilevers

Experimental

Patients received a full set of 0.022- inch slot brackets (Mini 2000, Ormco) with Roth prescription. Lower first molars received double tubed bands while 2nd molars received single bondable tubes. Leveling and alignment phase then started with 0.014 inch NiTi wires engaging all teeth and synched behind 2nd molars. Two 0.017" x 0.025" TMA (Ormco) sectional wires were attached to auxiliary tubes on 1st molars with tip back bends mesial to the molars and attached with hooks distal to lateral incisors on top of basal leveling arch wire. Amount of intrusive force was measured to range between 20 and 40 grams per side. Basal leveling arches were upgraded whenever needed. All patients were assessed after 6 months of treatment.

Intervention: Auxiliary cantilever intrusion arches on initial archwires (Device)

Routine leveling and alignment

Active Comparator

Patients received a full set of 0.022- inch slot brackets (Mini 2000, Ormco) with Roth prescription, 1st and 2nd molars received tubes or bands according to each patient's further needs Lower arch was leveled and aligned with sequential wires starting with 14 NiTi and upgraded when needed. All patients were assessed after 6 months of treatment.

Intervention: Routine leveling and alignment (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

True incisor intrusion

Time Frame: six months

Perpendicular distance between the center of resistance of mandibular central incisor and the mandibular plane measured on lateral cephalometric x-rays

Extrusion of lower first molar

Time Frame: six months

Perpendicular distance between the mesio-buccal cusp tip of the lower first molar and mandibular plane measured on lateral cephalometric x-rays

Lower incisor intrusion and proclination

Time Frame: six months

Perpendicular distance between the incisal edge of the lower central incisor and mandibular plane measured on lateral cephalometric x-rays

Overbite

Time Frame: six months

Distance between incisal edges of upper and lower incisors measured on lateral cephalometric x-rays

Proclination of lower incisors

Time Frame: six months

Angle formed by the long axis of mandibular central incisor and mandibular plane measured on lateral cephalometric x-rays

Lower incisor intrusion

Time Frame: six months

Perpendicular distance between the apex of the lower central incisor and mandibular plane measured on lateral cephalometric x-rays

Distal tip of lower first molar

Time Frame: six months

Angle formed between the long axis of lower 1st molar and mandibular plane measured on lateral cephalometric x-rays

Secondary Outcomes

  • Root resorption of lower incisors(six months)
  • Depth of curve of Spee(six months)
  • Depth of gingival sulcus(six months)
  • Width of keratinized gingiva(six months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mona El-Maghraby

MSc candidate, Orthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

Alexandria University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials