MedPath

Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Intervention for Non-STEMI Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Myocardial Infarction
Registration Number
NCT02419833
Lead Sponsor
Clinical Centre of Serbia
Brief Summary

In patients with acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation on ECG (non-STEMI), previous studies have indicated that routine invasive treatment confers more benefit as compared to selective invasive approach. The benefits of routine invasive coronary intervention have been the most evident in patients with higher baseline risk profile. However, the question of optimal timing of routine invasive intervention remains unsolved.

Immediate invasive intervention early after admission for non-STEMI may limit myocardial necrosis by securing the patency of the culprit coronary artery. Nevertheless, several previous studies reported higher levels of biomarkers of myocardial injury in patients undergoing early PCI. The question of earlier versus delayed procedure in non-STEMI patients may thus amount to whether the risk of intervening on an unstable plaque is greater than the risk of new ischemic events while waiting for the invasive procedure.

The purpose of the present study is to compare effects of immediate coronary intervention, within 2 hours of admission, versus delayed intervention, within 2-72 hours after admission, in patients witn non-STEMI.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
323
Inclusion Criteria
  1. episode of chest pain occurring no longer than 24 hours prior to admission
  2. elevation of cardiac troponin I above the upper limit of normal (ULN)
  3. new ST-segment depression at least 1 millivolt (mV) and/or T-wave inversion or transient ST-segment elevation in ≥ 2 contiguous leads
Exclusion Criteria
  1. age < 18 years
  2. persistent ST-segment elevation
  3. hemodynamic instability
  4. cardiogenic shock on admission
  5. life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias on admission
  6. refractory angina on admission
  7. active bleeding
  8. any contraindication for the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)
  9. presence of comorbidities with life expectancy < 6 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Composite of all-cause death or myocardial reinfarctionwithin 30 days of randomization
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Composite of all-cause death, myocardial reinfarction or recurrent ischemiawithin 30 days of randomization
All-cause mortalitywithin 30 days, 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization
Myocardial reinfarctionwithin 30 days, 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization
Strokewithin 30 days, 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization
Major bleedingwithin 30 days, 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization
Duration of index hospitalizationat 30-day follow-up, the duration of hospital stay is assessed
Recurrent ischemiawithin 30 days of randomization

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Clinical Centre of Serbia, Department of Cardiology

🇷🇸

Belgrade, Serbia

Clinical Centre of Serbia, Department of Cardiology
🇷🇸Belgrade, Serbia

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.