Feasibility Study of Multidimensional Rehabilitation in the Metaverse
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Interventions
- Device: Multidimensional Rehabilitation in the Metaverse
- Registration Number
- NCT06354595
- Lead Sponsor
- Qu Shen
- Brief Summary
The investigators evaluated and optimized the Metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform based on the use of the Metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform by colorectal cancer survivors and their families, and finally launched the Metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform.
- Detailed Description
The investigatorse intend to invite colorectal cancer survivors and their families to use the metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform. Interviews with users, user experience optimization of the metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform, and then evaluation of the platform through system usability evaluation. Gain insight into the experience of colorectal cancer survivors using the metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform, and understand their opinions and suggestions to explore the usability of the metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 10
- Patients undergoing adjuvant therapy after radical colorectal cancer resection; Age over 18 years old, under 65 years old, non-pregnant; Volunteering to participate in the research of this topic; Mobile phones are available
- Patients with multiple cancers; Have special dietary needs.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Colorectal cancer survivors and their families Multidimensional Rehabilitation in the Metaverse Using the Colorectal Cancer Survivor Metaverse Multidimensional Rehabilitation Platform, and provide feedback and suggestions.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) Third Edition 4th week The questionnaire includes three dimensions: usefulness, information quality, interface quality, and one overall evaluation item, totaling 20 items. Each item is rated on a scale from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree' with scores ranging from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates higher user satisfaction.
System Usability Scale (SUS) 4th week Used to evaluate user experience, employing the Likert 5-point scale method, consisting of 10 questions. Questions 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 are positively worded, while questions 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 are negatively worded. The validity of the scale is 0.85. The SUS is scored on a percentage scale. When the questionnaire score is above 70, the product is considered 'good,' and above 50 is considered 'okay.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Semi-structured interview 4th week Through interviews, conducting interviews with colorectal cancer patients on the theme of 'platform implementation effectiveness' to understand the evaluation of colorectal cancer patients on this mobile healthcare platform.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Yuru Hu
🇨🇳Xiamen, Fujian, China