NL-OMON52477已完成不适用
Comparison of non-invasive bedside methods to estimate central venous pressure - Comparison of bedside methods to estimate central venous pressure
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 78
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 至 99（—）
入选标准
- •- >= 18 years old
- •- Admitted to the ward or intensive care unit
- •- Indwelling central venous catheter in jugular vein or subclavian vein OR
- •indwelling peripherally inserted central catheter
排除标准
- •- Inability to assess CVP by both methods due to cervical adiposity, lack of
- •echogenic window, etc.
- •- Pregnancy
- •- Undergoing positive pressure ventilation
- •- Severe tricuspid regurgitation
- •- Superior vena cava syndrome
- •- Neurotrauma
- •- Any condition that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with
- •the measurements.
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
Comparison of bedside methods to estimate CVPHeart disease, shockNL-OMON22937A.J. Fogteloo, MD, PhD Head of the Subdepartment of Acute Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre78
尚未招募
3 期
Comparison of 2 methods for treatment of missing gums in between teeth.CTRI/2024/02/063384Bindu DR
已完成
不适用
Comparing Non-invasive Diagnostic Methods for Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis: A Prospective StudyArteriovenous fistula stenosishemodialysis,arteriovenous fistula,arteriovenous fistula stenosis,access flowTCTR20190325002Siriraj hospital Mahidol university23
已完成
不适用
Comparing two methods of non invasive ventilatory support in preterm infantsIRCT201702063915N19Tabriz University of Medical Sciences66
尚未招募
3 期
Comparison of conventional methods of pain management with regional anaesthesia in patients with acute pancreatitisCTRI/2023/08/055935aureen Naik