TCTR20220105003
Completed
Phase 2
Early versus Delayed enteral feeding after Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement in adult patients, A randomized controlled trial
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Appropriate time for feeding after PEG
- Sponsor
- Faculty of Medicine Siriraj hospital
- Enrollment
- 160
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •18\-85 years old
- •\- Underlying conditions
- •Non\-cancer ex. Neurological diseases
- •Cancer ex. CA esophagus, CA head and neck
- •\- Underwent push\-PEG in Siriraj hospital
Exclusion Criteria
- •\- Life expectancy less than 30 days
- •\- ASA 4,5 and ECOG PS 4
- •\- BMI \< 18 or \> 30 kg/m2
- •\- Serum albumin \<2\.5 g/dL
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
Early feeding versus routine post operative feeding in pediatric patients with acute appendicitisthirstyvomitingpain scoreanastomotic leakageearly feedingappendectomyTCTR20201119002none60
Recruiting
Phase 4
Early enteral feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in esophageal and neck cancer. A randomized controlled trial.percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.early feeding, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, esophageal cancer, neck cancer.TCTR20240501002Sakchai Ruangsin110
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Full feeding versus traditional increment feeding in small newborn babiesCTRI/2022/09/045974one
Completed
Not Applicable
Effect of total parenteral feeding on the postprandial bile acid responseNL-OMON44354Academisch Medisch Centrum8
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Early versus late parenteral nutrition in term and late preterm infants: A Randomized Controlled TrialACTRN12620000324910Perth Children's Hospital60