Comparison between two different materials for making aesthetic orthodontic bandages in terms of color stability and elastic properties
- Conditions
- Major anomalies of jaw sizeMalocclusion, unspecifiedDentofacial anomaly, unspecifiedAnomalies of tooth positionOther dentofacial anomalies.K07.0K07.4K07.9K07.3K07.8
- Registration Number
- RBR-4mtyr5
- Lead Sponsor
- Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto - Universidade de São Paulo (FORP/USP)
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Data analysis completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Patients with complete permanent dentition (except third molars); between 12 to 20 years old, undergoing orthodontic treatment; good general and oral health; who have not used mouthwash and systemic medication in the last 3 months.
Patients in the transitory phase of dentition, still with the presence of deciduous teeth, presenting poor oral hygiene and consequent oral health, patients with systemic problems and who have used mouthwash and systemic medication for continuous use in the last 3 months.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Intervention
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Expected outcome 1: It was expected that there would be no difference between aesthetic polyurethane and silicone elastomeric bandages in relation to color stability, assessed using a calibrated portable digital spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) and elastic properties by means of tensile testing. The whitening toothpaste was not expected to interfere with the color stability of silicone and polyurethane bandages.;Outcome found 1: No difference was found in color stability and elastic properties between the aesthetic elastomeric modules of polyurethane and silicone. The whitening toothpaste did not influence the performance of the bandages with regard to color stability, surface degradation, and elastic properties, after 30 days in the oral cavity.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Expected outcome 2: Secondary outcomes are not expected;Outcome found 2: No secondary outcomes were obtained