跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/10/096236
CTRI/2025/10/096236尚未招募3 期

Comparison of the performance of video laryngoscope with hybrid technique using both video laryngoscope and flexible bronchoscope for endotracheal intubation in adult patients with predicted difficult intubation: A randomized controlled trial

Lady hardinge medical College and associated hospitals3 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2025年11月5日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
60
试验地点
3
主要终点
Proportion of patients with successful first-attempt intubation with video laryngoscope vs hybrid technique using both video laryngoscope and flexible bronchoscope in adult patients with predicted difficult intubation

研究概览

简要总结

Study will be conducted after approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) and registration with Clinical Trial Registry India (CTRI). A pre-anesthetic checkup shall be done and written informed consent will be obtained from the patient.

A senior anaesthesiologist will perform airway assessment to determine the predicted difficult airway as per inclusion criteria mentioned above. Patients shall be kept fasting as per the standard guidelines and will receive premedication as per the decision of anaesthesiologist. In the operation theatre, an intravenous line will be secured and standard monitoring will be attached using a multichannel monitor and baseline parameters consisting of heart rate, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SPo2), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) shall be recorded. As per standard protocol of managing a difficult airway, a difficult airway cart will be kept and another senior anesthesiologist shall remain on standby while securing the airway. All patients will be positioned in the sniffing position. Patients will be randomized into two groups i.e. Group-VL, Group-FVL (FB+VL). According to the group allotted, the respective devices shall be prepared. In Group VL an endotracheal tube (ETT) loaded over a stylet shall be kept ready and in Group FVL an ETT loaded over the flexible bronchoscope shall be kept ready.

A standard anesthetic technique will be adopted for all patients. Patients will receive injection fentanyl 2 µg/kg iv and general anesthesia will be induced with injection propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg i.v. After checking adequacy of mask ventilation, muscle relaxation will be achieved with injection rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg iv and tracheal intubation will be attempted after 3 minutes of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) with oxygen and 2% sevoflurane, with an appropriately sized PVC tracheal tube by C-MAC video laryngoscope in Group VL. In Group FVL, first the VL shall be introduced and once the glottis is visualized, another anesthesia provider shall insert the FB and taking clues from the VL view, FB guided intubation shall be performed. The intubation will be performed by a senior anesthesiologist experienced for at least 10 years with both the devices. Tube position will be checked by auscultation and confirmed by capnography. Time taken for tracheal intubation will be defined as the time from introduction of laryngoscope to the appearance of first square wave capnographic trace. Time taken for tracheal intubation will be recorded by stopwatch. Optimal External Laryngeal Manipulation (OELM) shall be allowed for achieving successful intubation and number of patients requiring application of this maneuver will be recorded. Any evidence of oro-dental trauma in terms of injury to lips, teeth, gums, and mucosa of the oropharynx shall be observed and recorded while withdrawing the device after the endotracheal intubation is achieved. After successful tracheal intubation, anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane in air and oxygen along with top ups of inj. rocuronium.

Failure of intubation shall be defined if more than two attempts are taken to secure the airway with either of the 2 techniques. In such a situation the airway will be secured as per the anesthesiologist discretion and the patient will be excluded from the study.

Intraoperative hemodynamics will be managed in accordance with surgical procedure and blood loss.

Trachea will be extubated as per standard protocol using inj. neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg iv and inj. glycopyrolate 0.01 mg/kg iv.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • ASA I-II, Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation, Patients with difficult airway assessed by senior anesthesiologist as having one or more of the following predictors: Modified Mallampati grade 3 or 4, inability to protrude the jaw, neck circumference greater than 36cm, thyromental distance smaller than 6cm, reduced range of neck flexion and extension.

排除标准

  • Patients with laryngeal or tracheal pathologies and mouth opening smaller than 3cm, Emergency surgery, Pregnant patient.

结局指标

主要结局

Proportion of patients with successful first-attempt intubation with video laryngoscope vs hybrid technique using both video laryngoscope and flexible bronchoscope in adult patients with predicted difficult intubation

时间窗: Immediately after completion of the first intubation attempt

次要结局

  • Time taken in seconds (Mean ± SD) for tracheal intubation in first attempt in both the groups(Time from introduction of laryngoscope to the appearance of first square wave capnographic trace in first attempt)
  • Proportion of patients with failed intubation in both the groups(After completion of 2 allowed intubation attempts in each patient.)
  • Proportion of patients requiring Optimal External Laryngeal Manipulation for achieving successful intubation in both the groups(Assessed at the time of intubation attempt)
  • Proportion of patients with oro-dental trauma in both the groups(Assessed during or immediately after intubation)

研究者

申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ayub Khan

Lady hardinge medical College and associated hospitals

研究点 (3)

Loading locations...

相似试验

A study comparing video laryngoscope and combined... | 临床试验