Effect of Sarcopenic Obesity on Weight Loss Outcomes and Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
- Conditions
- Sarcopenic ObesityBody Composition
- Interventions
- Procedure: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
- Registration Number
- NCT05826210
- Lead Sponsor
- Fujian Medical University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of sarcopenic obesity (SO) on weight loss outcomes and improvement of quality of life after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
- Detailed Description
Sarcopenic obesity is a state in which a lack of muscle mass and strength coexists with an increase in fat mass, and it may affect the health outcome of people with obesity after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).No studies have reported differences in weight loss outcomes between patients with SO and those with non-sarcopenic obesity (NSO) after LSG. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically evaluate the differences in weight loss and quality of life (QOL) evaluation between patients with SO and NSO after LSG and provide high-level evidence-based medical evidence for the impact of SO on weight loss in the obese population and refinement of follow-up strategies.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 245
- Obese patients who met the indications for LSG and were followed up regularly as planned after surgery.
- incomplete critical clinical data;
- incomplete imaging data;
- insufficient follow-up data.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Sarcopenic obesity group Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy Patients who underwent LSG with FM/FFM\>0.80 calculated from the cross-sectional CT image of L3 vertebra. Non-sarcopenic obesity group Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy Patients who underwent LSG with FM/FFM\<0.80 calculated from the cross-sectional CT image of L3 vertebra.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method %EWL 6 month after surgery Percentage excess weight loss is calculated as (initial weight - 6-month weight)/(initial weight - ideal weight) × 100%.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method %EWL 12 month after surgery Percentage excess weight loss is calculated as (initial weight - 12-month weight)/(initial weight - ideal weight) × 100%.
%TWL 12 month after surgery Percentage total weight loss is calculated as (initial weight - 12-month weight)/(initial weight) × 100%
EBMI 6 month after surgery Excess BMI is calculated as(follow-up BMI - ideal BMI)
%WL 6 month after surgery Percentage weight loss is calculated as (follow-up weight/initial weight) × 100%
MA II score 6 month after surgery Moorhead-Ardelt QOL questionnaire is a six-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the patient's subjective impression of QOL,The total score ranges from -3 to +3 and defines five outcome groups: very poor, poor, fair, good, and very good. Good and very good outcomes were considered satisfactory.
BAROS score 6 month after surgery The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System(BAROS)combines the Moorhead-Ardelt QOL questionnaire with other data relevant to bariatric surgery, including the %EWL, improvement in comorbid conditions, and complications.A BAROS score ≤1 was considered a failure; \>1-3, fair; \>3-5, good; \>5-7, very good; and \>7, excellent.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Chang-ming Huang
🇨🇳Fuzhou, Fujian, China