Innovative Models in the Rehabilitation of the Elderly With Hip Fractures Through Technological Innovation
- Conditions
- Hip FracturesFrail ElderlyRobotic Rehabilitation
- Interventions
- Other: traditional rehabilitationOther: virtual reality games interventionOther: robotic treadmill intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT04095338
- Lead Sponsor
- Istituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura per Anziani
- Brief Summary
The final goals of the present study is to propose a new approach in the hip fracture rehabilitation in elderly subjects, focused on the use of robotic device and to check the results not only at the end of the treatment but also in the long term, foreseeing 3 follow-up.
- Detailed Description
Balance and deficit in walking are some of the main characteristics of aging and are considered among the risk factors for falls. Falls are a risk factor for future falls and are associated with other adverse health outcomes such as fear of falling or fractures. In particular, hip fracture in aged patients is an important health problem. In fact, one in three patients dies within the first year after injury, while survivors have poor quality of life For this reason, the development of prevention tools and innovative strategies in the rehabilitation field should be one of the main objectives in the treatment of the diseases afflicting the elderly, such as hip fractures. Effective interventions to promote hip recovery post hip fracture are characterized by intensive and repetitive movements. One treatment approach to increase number of steps during rehabilitation sessions and to improve the balance and the endurance of the patients is the use of robotic systems.
This study is a randomized controlled trial. A total of 195 patients with hip fractures will be recruited and randomly divided into three groups, to receive a traditional rehabilitation program or a robotic rehabilitation in addition to the traditional therapy. Assessments will be performed at baseline, at the end of treatment and 6 months, 1 year and 2 years from the end of the treatment. For the study, post-hospitalization subjects will be taken into consideration, after four weeks from the hospitalization. A 20 treatment sessions will be conducted, divided into 3 training sessions per week, for 7 weeks. The control group will perform traditional therapy sessions lasting 50 minutes. The technological intervention group will carry out 30 minutes of traditional therapy and 20 minutes of treatment with a robotic system.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 195
- Capacity to consent
- Traumatic event within 60 days
- Romberg test: negative
- Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score ≤ 2
- Ranking scale score ≤ 3;
- Past history of syncopal episodes
- Presence of non-pharmacologically compensated behavioral syndromes
- Presence of pain that prevents walking or standing
- Presence of neurological pathologies that compromise balance (Multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, stroke, ataxias, poliomyelitis)
- Spinal stenosis
- Radiculopathy
- Neuropathies lower limbs
- Disabling disabilities that impair walking (eg congenital malformations of the foot)
- Heterometry > 2 cm
- Clinical dementia rating (CDR) score ≥ 3
- Severe systemic diseases with life expectancy < 1 year
- Patients unable to follow up.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description control group traditional rehabilitation Ten traditional physical treatment sessions divided into 2 training sessions per week for 5 weeks virtual reality games arm virtual reality games intervention Ten technological treatment sessions divided into 2 training sessions per week for 5 weeks. robotic treadmill arm robotic treadmill intervention Ten traditional physical treatment sessions divided into 2 training sessions per week for 5 weeks.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method difference in falling risk among virtual reality games arm, robotic treadmill arm and control arm before treatment, and 5 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after intervention commencement falling risk will be evaluated by the Tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment (POMA). POMA test has two subscales, Balance and Gait sections. Total score is obtained by adding the scores of the two subscales (balance + gait) . Total score \< 19 high fall risk, total score 19-24 medium fall risk, total score 25-28 low fall risk
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method difference in fear of falling among virtual reality games arm, robotic treadmill arm and control arm before treatment, and 5 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after intervention commencement fear of falling will be evaluated by the Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I). Higher scores represent greater the fear of falling (ranging from 16 to 64)
difference in gait performance among virtual reality games arm, robotic treadmill arm and control arm before treatment, and 5 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after intervention commencement gait performance will be evaluated by the walking speed evaluated by instrumental gait analysis
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
INRCA Research Hospital
🇮🇹Fermo, Italy