MedPath

Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Registration Number
NCT00003290
Lead Sponsor
Medical Research Council
Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard radiation therapy is more effective than high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard radiation therapy with that of high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with stage II or stage III prostate cancer.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare local tumor control in patients with stage II or III prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy with standard vs high-dose conformal radiotherapy.

* Compare the incidence of biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 2 ng/mL at 6 or more months after initiation of radiotherapy and PSA rising from nadir level by at least 50%), development of metastases, and survival in patients treated with these regimens.

* Compare the acute and late radiation-induced side effects of these regimens in this patient population.

* Compare aspects of quality of life, health economics, models of normal tissue, and tumor control in patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to prostate-specific antigen, T stage, and Gleason score. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.

All patients receive neoadjuvant androgen deprivation with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists every 4 weeks beginning 3-6 months before initiation of radiotherapy and continuing until completion of radiotherapy.

* Arm I: Patients undergo standard conformal radiotherapy for 6.5 weeks.

* Arm II: Patients undergo high-dose conformal radiotherapy for 7.5 weeks. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.

Patients are followed every 6 months for 2 years and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 800 patients will be accrued for this study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
800
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (19)

Christie Hospital N.H.S. Trust

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Manchester, England, United Kingdom

Middlesex Hospital- Meyerstein Institute

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

London, England, United Kingdom

Royal Hospital for Sick Children

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom

Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town

πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

Cape Town, South Africa

Norfolk & Norwich Hospital

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Norwich, England, United Kingdom

Mount Vernon Hospital

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Northwood, England, United Kingdom

Royal Marsden Hospital

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Sutton, England, United Kingdom

Cookridge Hospital

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Leeds, England, United Kingdom

Royal Preston Hospital

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Preston, United Kingdom

Bristol Royal Hospital for Children

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Bristol, England, United Kingdom

Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Bristol, England, United Kingdom

Derbyshire Royal Infirmary

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Derby, England, United Kingdom

Newcastle General Hospital

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Newcastle Upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom

Oxford Radcliffe Hospital

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Oxford, England, United Kingdom

Southend NHS Trust Hospital

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Westcliff-On-Sea, England, United Kingdom

Beatson Oncology Centre

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

University of Birmingham

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Birmingham, England, United Kingdom

Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Trust

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Merseyside, England, United Kingdom

University Hospitals of Leicester

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Leicester, England, United Kingdom

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath