The effect of an intervention program based on Education in patients with Chronic Low Back Pai
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back PainC23.888.592.612.274
- Registration Number
- RBR-7fr89pt
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruitment completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
This study will include individuals of both sexes, aged between 18 and 65 years, with chronic low back pain for at least four months. To ensure that a minimally relevant clinical difference (DCMR) is detected, minimum clinical severity indices have been determined so that participants are included.
Exclusion Criteria
Individuals with cancer pain, recent fracture history, rheumatic diseases, chronic painful syndromes (with fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome), postoperative period of musculoskeletal diseases in the last 12 months, headache, epilepsy will not be included in association with chronic low back pain.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Intervention
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary outcome 2: Improvement of function that will be assessed through the Disability Questionnaire Roland Morris (DQRM), which contain 24 dichotomous questions and the final result corresponds to the sum of yes” answers. Will also be performed the frontal support test that evaluates the muscular endurance and the sit and stand test with five repetitions (SST-5R).<br>;Primary outcome 1: improvement in pain intensity, that will be measured through the numerical estimation scale (NES). In this instrument, patients assess their pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain” and 10 indicating worst pain imaginable.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Secondary outcome 1: Kinesiophobia: The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (ETC) will be used for evaluation, consisting of a questionnaire self-administered, composed of 17 questions that address pain and symptom intensity.;Secondary outcome 2: Depressive symptoms: Patient Health will be used Questionnaire (PHQ-2), which has been used as an initial tool screening for depression.Has Likert-type responses from zero (‘never”) to three points (almost every day”).;Secondary outcome 3:Self-efficacy: It will be measured using the chronic pain self-efficacy scale (AEDC). Only the pain control domain, which contains 5 items, will be used; each item is evaluated by a Likert scale from 10 to 100 points corresponding to the certainty that one has in relation to each item.<br><br>;Secondary outcome 4: Catastrophization: For this construct, it will be used the Scale of Catastrophic Thoughts about Pain (SCTP) and consists of nine items staggered on a Likert scale from zero to five.