MedPath

Video-Interpreting in an Emergency Trauma Room Setting - a Feasibility Trial

Recruiting
Conditions
Communication Barriers
Registration Number
NCT06596538
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Brief Summary

Background: Global migration increases the likelihood of language barriers. In medical situations language barriers have a negative effect on quality of treatment and thus endanger patient safety.

In-hospital settings feasibility of video-translation has been demonstrated, yet there is lack of evidence in emergency trauma rooms. There, the physicians have to deal with time-critical decisions. Aims: This feasibility trial aims to investigate technical feasibility, usability as well as the impact on decision-making (e.g. alteration of treatment strategies). Methods: In this study 50 responsive patients with language barriers will be included. The anesthesiologic emergency physician will start video-translation via a tablet. Feasibility, quality of communication, usability as well as changes in diagnosis and treatment will be gathered and analyzed.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • adult patients, at least 18 years old
  • awake, responsive patients
  • language barrier (Albanian, Dari, Romanian, Turkish, Modern Standard Arabic, Arabic, Farsi, Russian, Hungarian, Bosnian-Croatian-Serbian, Kurdish (Kurmanci), Slovakian, Bulgarian, Polish, and Czech)
Exclusion Criteria
  • unconscious patients
  • cardiac arrest patients
  • delay of treatment due to e-translation
  • refusal of video-translation by the patient

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Technical FeasibilityDirectly after use of video-interpreting

Occurance of technical problems will be reported

Usability of video-interpretingDirectly after use of video-interpreting

The usability will be evaluated afterwards by the anesthesiologic emergency physician using a questionnaire including following items on a 7-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree):

* Video-interpreting was easy to use.

* I feel comfortable to use video-interpreting during the situation.

* The amount of time involved to use video-interpreting has been fitting for me.

* I would use video-interpreting again.

* Video-interpreting was useful for my healthcare practice in this situation.

Impact on emergency physician's decisionsDirectly after use of video-interpreting

The impact of video-translation will be evaluated regarding alteration of medical history or treatment (yes/no)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

MUVienna

🇦🇹

Vienna, Austria

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath