MedPath

MyVoice:Rheum Decision Aid for Women With Rheumatic Diseases

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Rheumatic Diseases
Contraception
Physician-Patient Relations
Interventions
Other: Pamphlet
Registration Number
NCT04879745
Lead Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Brief Summary

This is a pilot trial to assess feasibility and acceptability of MyVoice:Rheum vs. a patient pamphlet among female patients ages 18-44 (n=40) who receive rheumatology care.

• Hypothesis: MyVoice:Rheum will be feasible and acceptable to patients who receive rheumatology care.

Detailed Description

The pilot will demonstrate if the MyVoice:Rheum decision aid can be feasibly and acceptably implemented into the rheumatology context and inform operational procedures for a future hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. Women in the intervention arm will receive the MyVoice:Rheum decision aid (n=30). Women in the control arm (n=9) will receive a widely-accessible paper-based pamphlet about pregnancy, which, similarly to MyVoice:Rheum, targets women with a broad range of rheumatic diseases.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
45
Inclusion Criteria

Patients must have at least one of four rheumatic diseases diagnosed by a rheumatologist: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), myositis, Sjogren's syndrome, vasculitis, spondyloarthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Patients must read and speak in English as a Spanish-language version of the tool has not yet been developed

Access to a smart phone, personal computer, or tablet.

Exclusion Criteria
  • Women who have had prior hysterectomy or sterilization, or are pregnant.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Pamphlet UsersPamphletPatients with a rheumatic disease who are given access to a widely-accessible pamphlet about family planning
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Acceptability of InterventionT2 (within 24 hours of intervention and appointment)

Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) consist of Four- item measure, Likert scales ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Score is determined by calculating the mean of scores, with a higher score indicating higher acceptability. We assigned a feasibility threshold of ≥ 3.5 of 5, for which higher scores indicate more positive responses.

Intervention Appropriateness MeasureT2 (within 24 hours of intervention and appointment)

The validated Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) consist of Four-item Likert scales ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree); we assigned a feasibility threshold of ≥ 3.5 of 5 for IAM scores, for which higher scores indicate more positive responses. Score is determined by calculating the mean, with a higher score indicating greater appropriateness.

System Usability ScaleT2 (within 24 hours of intervention and appointment)

Usability was assessed via summary scores from the System Usability Scale (SUS), which consists of a 10-item Likert scale with scores ranging from 0-100; overall score calculated by finding the mean of items on scale. We set a threshold of scores \>80.3 as 'A'/excellent and 68-80.3 as 'B'/very good, consistent with standard rating for the SUS.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

UPMC Falk Rheumatology Clinic

🇺🇸

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

UPMC Lupus Center of Excellence

🇺🇸

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath