跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00986050
NCT00986050已完成4 期

A Comparison of Drug Eluting and Bare Metal Stents With or Without Abciximab in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction The Eindhoven Reperfusion Study

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 907 人开始时间: 2006年1月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
907
试验地点
1
主要终点
target vessel failure

研究概览

简要总结

The DEBATER study is designed to determine the superiority of abciximab over no abciximab and to determine the superiority of drug eluting stents over bare metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention.

详细描述

In patients with acute myocardial infarction primary PCI without prior thrombolytic therapy, is the treatment of choice.

The recommendation for routine stenting in PCI is based on 4 studies that have demonstrated the usefulness of bare metal stents in patients with STEMI. However this recommendation cannot be extrapolated (yet) to the use of drug eluting stents. Although DES have been used widely in unstable angina and in acute myocardial infarction, to date there are no evidence-based recommendations to support the routine use of DES in STEMI.

GPI have been studied extensively in patients with non-STsegment elevation myocardial infarctions (NSTEMI) with planned or performed PCI. In STEMI tirofiban and and eptifibatide are less well investigated, and only abciximab is recommended in primary PCI, but the long term benefits require more investigation. In PCI randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT's) abciximab consistently showed a significant reduction in the rate of myocardial infarction and the need for urgent revascularization. Abciximab has been evaluated in 5 RCT's in association with primary PCI. The pooled analysis for the clinical outcome at 30 days, demonstrate a significant reduction of death, re- infarction and target vessel revascularization (TVR), mainly due to a reduction of repeat intervention. The long-term benefits require more investigation.

The DEBATER trial is designed to answer the questions about the need for abciximab and about the use of DES in primary PCI.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • STEMI ≤ 12 hours (or STEMI equivalent).
  • No contra - indications for primary PCI.
  • No contra - indications for abciximab.
  • Informed consent from the patient.

排除标准

  • Contra - indication for primary PCI: History of peripheral/coronary artery disease that is inaccessible for angiography or PCI.
  • Contra - indications for GPI: Ongoing bleeding, bleeding diathesis, cerebrovascular accident < 6 months, major surgery/trauma < 6 months, platelet count < 100.000 mm3 , intracranial arteriovenous malformation or neoplasm, malignant hypertension, INR >1.5, severe hepatic dysfunction
  • Contra - indications for clopidogrel:
  • Severe liver dysfunction, pathological bleeding disorders such as peptic ulcer or intracranial bleeding.
  • Thrombolytic therapy < 24 hours.
  • Therapy with GPI < 24 hours.
  • Anticoagulation therapy.
  • Co - morbid conditions with a predictable fatal outcome in the short run.
  • No informed consent: refusal, coma, artificial respiration, impaired mentation.

研究组 & 干预措施

Bare metal stent (BMS)

Active Comparator

干预措施: bare metal stent prokinetic, chrono, skylor or bluemedical (Device)

Drug eluting stent (DES)

Active Comparator

干预措施: drug eluting stent (sirolimus eluting) - CYPHER stent (Device)

Abciximab

Active Comparator

干预措施: Abciximab (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

target vessel failure

时间窗: 30 days and one year

次要结局

  • Major adverse cardiac and cerebral adverse events ( MACCE)(30 days and one year)

研究者

发起方
Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of Drug Eluting and Bare Metal Stents... | 临床试验